采用基于16S rDNA的PCR DGGE (变性梯度凝胶电泳) 图谱并通过条带割胶回收DNA 进行序列分析,初步探讨了不同曝气条件下黑臭河道底泥中细菌群落结构多样性及其变化,同时用冗余分析(RDA)研究了环境因子与细菌群落结构之间的关系. 结果表明,人工曝气对黑臭河道底泥细菌群落结构产生明显的影响,并且随不同曝气强度底泥细菌群落多样性呈现不同的变化,其中当曝气扰动雷诺数(Re)为1810,溶解氧(DO)为7.35时,细菌优势群落多样性最高;序列比对分析推测适度的曝气有利于促进碳、氮、硫循环相关细菌的生长,其中以变形菌门为主导;冗余分析显示DO和Re对细菌群落结构影响显著.
In this study, 16S rDNA based PCR amplification and denaturing gradientgel electrophoresis (PCRDGGE) as well as sequence alignment from the excised DGGE bands were used to investigate the bacterial diversity and variation. In addition, the redundancy analysis was adopted to assess the relationship between bacterial community structure and environmental factors. The results showed that aeration had marked effects on bacterial community structure in malodorous river sediments and different aeration intensities resulted in variable bacterial community. Amongst them the highest richness of bacterial community was observed with the aeration turbulence of Re=1 810 and DO of 7.35. It was also inferred that moderate aeration facilitated the growths of related bacteria to N and Scycling and theProteobacteria was dominant. It was also found that DO and Re played important roles in bacterial community from river sediments.
[1]何岩, 沈叔云, 黄民生, 等. 城市黑臭河道底泥内源氮硝化—反硝化作用研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012(6):1166 1170.
[2]WU Q, ZHANG R, HUAN S, et al. Effects of bacteria on nitrogenand phosphorus release from river sediment [J]. Journal of Environmental SciencesChina, 2008, 20(4): 404412.
[3]SANCHEZANDREA I, RODRIGUEZ N, AMILS R, et al. Microbial diversity in anaerobic sediments at río tinto, a naturally acidic environment with a high heavy metal content[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(17):6085–6093.
[4]HEY, CHENY, ZHANGY, et al. Role of aerated turbulence in the fate of endogenous nitrogen from malodorous river sediments [J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2013, 30(1): 1116.
[5]徐欢. 水培植物净化槽对黑臭河水营养盐净化效果及其微生物机制研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2012.
[6]HE Y, ZHAO Y C, ZHOU G M, et al. Evaluation of extraction and purification methods for obtaining PCRamplifiable DNA from aged refuse for microbial community analysis[J]. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 25:20432051.
[7]MURRAY A E, HOLLIBUGH J T, ORREGO C. Phylogenetic compositions of bacterioplankton from two California estuaries compared by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996, 62(7): 26762680.
[8]ROMANENKOLA, TANAKA N, KALINOVSKAYA NI, et al. Diversity and antimicrobial activity of deepsea surface sediment associated bacteria from the Sea of Japan [J].World Journal of and Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 29:11691177.
[9]刘欣. 胶州湾沉积物细菌多样性及菌群时空分布规律研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学,2010 .
[10]FUJIOKA R S. Monitoring coastal marine waters for sporeforming bacteria of faecal and soilorigin to determine point from nonpoint source pollution [J]. Water Science & Technology, 2001, 44(7): 181188.
[11]VELMURUGAN N, KALPANA D, CHO J Y, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of culturable marine bacteria in sediments from South Korean Yellow Sea[J]. Microbiology, 2011, 80 (2), 261272.
[12]RAMOSPADRON E, BORDENAVE S, LIN S, et al. Carbon and sulfur cycling by microbial communities in a gypsumTreated oil sands tailings pond[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 45(2): 439446.