为研究克隆文库法和高通量测序两种方法对烟叶表面微生物类群的检测效果，确定检测烟叶表面微生物多样性的最优方法，检测了基于细菌16S rDNA和真菌ITS区域的烤烟表面微生物类群的多样性. 结果显示，高通量测序得到的序列数量比克隆文库法多，两种方法检测到细菌的OTU数目相近，但高通量检测的真菌OTU数目较多；稀疏曲线显示高通量测序的数据饱和度更高；预计的群落多样性(Chao1指数和Ace指数)克隆文库法均高于高通量测序法，实际的群落多样性(Simpson指数和Shannon指数)表明克隆文库法检测的细菌多样性略高，而高通量测序检测的真菌多样性略高；在检测到的细菌和真菌种类上，高通量测序略多于克隆文库法，两种方法检测的细菌优势类群基本一致，为假单胞菌属、不动杆菌属和鞘氨醇单胞菌属，但真菌类群相差较大，且高通量测序检测到大量新的真菌序列. 总体上，高通量测序方法具有通量大、产出数据多的优势，可更全面、更准确地反映烟叶表面微生物群落结构.
In order to compare the microbial communities on tobacco leaves between clone library method and highthroughput sequencing method, we analyzed the diversity of microbial communities based on bacterial 16S rDNA and fungal ITS on tobacco leaves collected from Fujian province in China. The results showed that more numbers of bacterial and fungal sequences were detected by highthroughput sequencing than clone library. The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) clustered from highthroughput sequencing method was almost the same as that from clone library method in bacterial communities, while that was higher from highthroughput sequencing in fungal communities. The rarefaction curves drawn from highthroughput sequencing method tended to approach the saturation plateau. The expected community diversity indices (Chao1 and Ace) were higher in clone library method, whereas the observed community diversity indices (Simpson and Shannon) suggested that higher bacterial diversities were detected through clone library method and higher fungal diversities were detected through highthroughput sequencing method. There were more kinds of bacteria and fungi genera identified through highthroughput sequencing method. The dominant genera of bacteria were similar detected from both of the methods, including Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and Sphingonomonas. However, the fungal genera detected through these two methods were significantly different. Overall, novel highthroughput sequencing methods outperform clone library approaches in terms of resolution and magnitude. They enable identification and relative quantification of community members of tobacco leaves and offer new insights into environmental microbiology.
［1］于建军, 李琳, 庞天河, 等. 烟叶发酵研究进展［J］. 河南农业大学学报, 2006, 40(1): 108112.
［2］刘萍, 张广民, 郑小嘎, 等. 烟叶表面微生物及其应用［J］. 微生物学通报, 2003, 30(6): 105110.
［3］韩锦峰, 朱大恒, 刘卫群, 等. 陈化发酵期间烤烟叶面微生物活性及其应用研究［J］. 中国烟草科学, 1997(4): 1516.
［4］邱立友, 赵铭钦, 岳雪梅, 等. 自然发酵烤烟叶面微生物区系的分离鉴定［J］. 烟草科技, 2000(3): 1417.
［5］AMANN R I, LUDWIG W, SCHLEIFER K H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation ［J］. Microbiological Reviews, 1995, 59(1): 143169.
［6］ZHAO M, WANG B, LI F, et al. Analysis of bacterial communities on aging fluecured tobacco leaves by 16S rDNA PCRDGGE technology ［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 73(6): 14351440.
［7］HUANG J, YANG J, DUAN Y, et al. Bacterial diversities on unaged and aging fluecured tobacco leaves estimated by 16S rRNA sequence analysis ［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 88(2): 553562.
［8］夏围围, 贾仲君. 高通量测序和DGGE分析土壤微生物群落的技术评价［J］. 微生物学报, 2014(12): 14891499.
［9］SU C, GU W, ZHE W, et al. Diversity and phylogeny of bacteria on Zimbabwe tobacco leaves estimated by 16S rRNA sequence analysis ［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 92(5): 10331044.
［10］伍雪莹, 梁书利, 韩双艳, 等. 不同陈化期烤烟叶表细菌的多样性及发育分析［J］. 广东农业科学, 2014(18): 2833.
［11］陈竹亭, 焉婷婷, 汤朝起, 等. 应用16S rDNA克隆文库技术分析陈化烟叶细菌多样性［J］. 中国烟草学报, 2012(4): 7782.
［12］SIMON C, DANIEL R. Metagenomic analyses: Past and future trends ［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(4): 11531161.
［13］GONTCHAROVA V, YOUN E, WOLCOTT R D, et al. Black box chimera check (B2C2): A windowsbased software for batch depletion of chimeras from bacterial 16S rRNA gene datasets ［J］. The Open Microbiology Journal, 2010(4): 4752.
［14］SCHLOSS P D, WESTCOTT S L, RYABIN T, et al. Introducing mothur: Opensource, platformindependent, communitysupported software for describing and comparing microbial communities ［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(23): 75377541.
［15］CAPORASO J G, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data ［J］. Nature Methods, 2010, 7(5): 335336.
［16］EDGAR R C, HAAS B J, CLEMENTE J C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection ［J］. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(16): 21942200.
［17］EDGAR R C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads ［J］. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(10): 996998.
［18］COLE J R, WANG Q, FISH J A, et al. Ribosomal database project: Data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis ［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 42(D1): D633D642.
［19］WANG Q, GARRITY G M, TIEDJE J M, et al. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy ［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73(16): 52615267.
中国综合性科技类核心期刊(北大核心)