生态与环境科学

底泥疏浚生态环境效应的后评价研究——以山东省某河段整治为例

  • 杨春懿 ,
  • 马广翔 ,
  • 顾俊杰 ,
  • 顾佳艳 ,
  • 何国富 ,
  • 孔维鑫 ,
  • 杨根森
展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学 上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室, 上海 200241
    2. 山东省环境保护科学研究设计院有限公司, 济南 250014

收稿日期: 2021-05-12

  网络出版日期: 2022-05-19

Study on ecological environmental effects of sediment dredging: A case study on river regulation in Shandong Province

  • Chunyi YANG ,
  • Guangxiang MA ,
  • Junjie GU ,
  • Jiayan GU ,
  • Guofu HE ,
  • Weixin KONG ,
  • Gensen YANG
Expand
  • 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
    2. Shandong Academy of Environmental Sciences Co. Ltd., Ji’nan 250014, China

Received date: 2021-05-12

  Online published: 2022-05-19

摘要

对山东省某河段疏浚示范工程进行生态环境效应后评价, 开展为期两年半的跟踪监测, 主要分析底泥疏浚对河段水质、新生沉积物、底栖生物、微生物的长期影响. 结果表明: 底泥疏浚可有效降低水中的CODCr、TP含量, 但对TN及NH4+-N含量的影响很小. 疏浚区新生沉积物中的C/N值逐渐降低, 这有利于微生物及底栖生物群落的恢复. 疏浚可在一定程度上降低表层沉积物中颤蚓科的平均生物量及密度, 而摇蚊科密度受疏浚影响较小. 疏浚并未对河段沉积物微生物群落结构带来显著改变, 这可能与疏浚深度有关. 外源污染物的输入、人为排水作业等均可影响疏浚河段的水质及沉积物污染物含量, 但当微生物群落基本构建完成后, 这种影响可能在较短时间内恢复. 综上所述, 疏浚总体工程效果在研究开展期间(即疏浚后2 ~ 4年)有持续体现, 即改善水质和沉积物污染状况, 有利于底栖动物和微生物的多样性恢复. 但随着时间的推移以及人为干扰的影响, 水质维持效果有所下降.

本文引用格式

杨春懿 , 马广翔 , 顾俊杰 , 顾佳艳 , 何国富 , 孔维鑫 , 杨根森 . 底泥疏浚生态环境效应的后评价研究——以山东省某河段整治为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 , 2022(3) : 61 -70 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2022.03.007

Abstract

In this study, follow-up monitoring over the course of two and a half years was carried out to analyze the long-term impact of sediment dredging on water quality, new sediments, benthos, and microorganisms of a river reach in Shandong Province. The results showed that the contents of CODCr and TP could be effectively removed by dredging, but little effect was observed on the contents of TN and NH4+-N. The C/N ratio in the new sediments decreased gradually over the observation period, which was beneficial to the recovery of microbial and benthic communities. Dredging can reduce the average biomass and density of tremididae in surface sediments to a certain extent, while Chironomidae density is less affected by dredging. Dredging did not change the microbial community structure significantly, which may be related to the depth of dredging. Exogenous pollutants and man-made drainage can affect the water quality and sediment pollutant content of the dredged river section; this effect, however, may recover in a short time after completion of the microbial community construction. In conclusion, the overall engineering effects of dredging were observed during the study period (2–4 years after dredging); in this time, the water quality and sediment pollution improved, which was conducive to the restoration of benthos and microbial diversity. However, with the passage of time and human interference, the net effect on water quality maintenance weakened.

参考文献

1 朱韻洁, 李国文, 张列宇, 等. 黑臭水体治理思路与技术措施. 环境工程技术学报, 2018, (5): 495- 501.
2 REDDY K R, FISHER M M, WANG Y, et al. Potential effects of sediment dredging on internal phosphorus loading in a shallow, subtropical lake. Lake and Reservoir Management, 2007, 23 (1): 27- 38.
3 WANG J, LIU X D, LU J. Urban river pollution control and remediation. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13, 1856- 1862.
4 梁佳文, 阳涛, 韩雪, 等. 城市河道底泥疏浚适宜深度初步研究——以伊通河为例. 环境生态学, 2020, 2 (11): 81- 90.
5 艾姣龙, 张磊, 宋金城, 等. 南太子湖底泥疏浚工程对湖水水质的影响. 建筑施工, 2020, 42 (7): 1256- 1258.
6 TANG X, WU M, DAI X, et al. Phosphorus storage dynamics and adsorption characteristics for sediment from a drinking water source reservoir and its relation with sediment compositions. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 64, 276- 284.
7 文帅龙, 龚琬晴, 吴涛, 等. 于桥水库沉积物-水界面氮磷剖面特征及交换通量. 环境科学, 2018, 39 (5): 2154- 2164.
8 王敬富, 陈敬安, 孙清清, 等. 底泥疏浚对阿哈水库内源污染的影响. 环境工程, 2018, 36 (3): 69- 73.
9 刘丽香, 韩永伟, 刘辉, 等. 疏浚技术及其对污染水体治理效果的影响. 环境工程技术学报, 2020, 10 (1): 63- 71.
10 钟继承, 范成新. 底泥疏浚效果及环境效应研究进展. 湖泊科学, 2007, (1): 1- 10.
11 RYDING S. Lake Treh?rningen restoration project. Changes in water quality after sediment dredging. Hydrobiologia, 1982, 92, 549- 558.
12 童敏, 杨乐, 黄民生, 等. 底泥疏浚对温州市牛桥底河水环境质量的影响. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, (2): 58- 66.
13 朱敏, 王国祥, 王建, 等. 南京玄武湖清淤前后底泥主要污染指标的变化. 南京师范大学学报(工程技术版), 2004, (2): 66- 69.
14 RASHEED M, BADRAN M I, HUETTEL M. Influence of sediment permeability and mineral composition on organic matter degradation in three sediments from the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Estuarine Coastal And Shelf Science, 2003, 57 (1/2): 369- 384.
15 王若冰, 赵钰, 单保庆, 等. 海河流域典型重污染河流滏阳河沉积物氨化和硝化速率研究. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38 (3): 858- 866.
16 赵彤, 蒋跃利, 闫浩, 等. 土壤氨化过程中微生物作用研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报, 2014, 20 (2): 315- 321.
17 尤平, 任辉. 底栖动物及其在水质评价和监测上的应用. 淮北煤师院学报(自然科学版), 2001, (4): 44- 48.
18 WILLIAM G N, DAVID J H. Development and use of site-specific chemical and biological criteria for assessing New Bedford Harbor pilot dredging project. Environmental Management, 1991, 15 (1): 105- 112.
19 ZHANG S, ZHOU Q, XU D, et al. Effects of sediment dredging on water quality and zooplankton community structure in a shallow of eutrophic lake. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 22 (2): 218- 224.
20 姜苹红, 周易勇, 纪磊, 等. 月湖底泥疏浚后底栖动物群落的恢复及其与环境的关系. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21 (6): 1088- 1095.
21 辽宁省环境监测实验中心. 辽河流域底栖动物监测图鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2014.
22 戴雅奇, 熊昀青, 由文辉. 疏浚对苏州河底栖动物群落结构的影响. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, (3): 83- 87.
23 吴沛沛, 刘劲松, 胡晓东, 等. 滆湖北部底泥疏浚的生态效应研究. 水生态学杂志, 2015, 36 (2): 32- 38.
24 刘建康. 高级水生生物学 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
25 毛志刚, 谷孝鸿, 陆小明, 等. 太湖东部不同类型湖区底泥疏浚的生态效应. 湖泊科学, 2014, 26 (3): 385- 392.
26 BOYD S E, LIMPENNY D S, REES H L, et al. Preliminary observations of the effects of dredging intensity on the re-colonisation of dredged sediments off the southeast coast of England (Area 222). Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science, 2003, 57 (1/2): 209- 223.
27 NEWELL R C, SEIDERER L J, HITCHCOCK D R. The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: A review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed. Oceanography and Maring Biology, 1998, 36, 127- 178.
28 钟继承, 刘国锋, 范成新, 等. 湖泊底泥疏浚环境效应: Ⅳ. 对沉积物微生物活性与群落功能多样性的影响及其意义. 湖泊科学, 2010, 22 (1): 21- 28.
文章导航

/