水环境评价与修复治理

太湖沿岸浅水湖泊生态修复过程中生态系统健康评价

  • 张勇 ,
  • 李灿 ,
  • 张华林 ,
  • 詹宇 ,
  • 王慧 ,
  • 肖逸凡 ,
  • 杨丽丽 ,
  • 刘佳奇 ,
  • 蒯正龙
展开
  • 1. 安徽建筑大学 环境与能源工程学院, 合肥 230601
    2. 安徽建筑大学 环境污染控制与废弃物资源化利用安徽省重点实验室, 合肥 230601
    3. 昆山市水务局, 江苏 昆山 215300
张 勇, 男, 教授, 硕士生导师, 研究方向为水处理技术. E-mail: zhangy@ahjzu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-05-05

  录用日期: 2023-08-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-01-23

基金资助

中国科学院科技服务网络计划(KFJ-STS-QYZD-173); 安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021A0619)

Evaluation of ecosystem health during ecological restoration of the shallow lakes along the shores of Taihu Lake

  • Yong ZHANG ,
  • Can LI ,
  • Hualin ZHANG ,
  • Yu ZHAN ,
  • Hui WANG ,
  • Yifan XIAO ,
  • Lili YANG ,
  • Jiaqi LIU ,
  • Zhenglong KUAI
Expand
  • 1. School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    2. Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    3. Kunshan Municipal Water Bureau, Kunshan, Jiangsu 215300, China

Received date: 2023-05-05

  Accepted date: 2023-08-30

  Online published: 2024-01-23

摘要

为评估生态修复过程中太湖沿岸浅水湖泊的生态系统健康状况, 于2022年对金墅港圩地水体进行了调查. 构建了水生态健康综合评估指标体系, 由目标层、准则层、指标层构成. 其中, 准则层由功能性、完整性、稳定性3项组成, 指标层由综合水质、营养状态等14个大项参数和pH值、温度、溶解氧等28个小项参数构成, 采用层次分析法分别确定了准则层和指标层的权重系数, 再使用比值法统一量纲. 结果表明, 在生态修复过程中, 功能评价指数在秋季达到最高, 完整性评价指数在秋、冬两季优于春、夏两季, 稳定性评价指数在夏季最高, 有70%的点位处于“健康”水平, 水生态健康综合评价指数持续上升. 说明生态修复工程有效地促进了水生态系统的重建与恢复, 这不仅对后续的修复和管理有重要意义, 而且能为其他湖泊的水生态修复和评价提供借鉴.

本文引用格式

张勇 , 李灿 , 张华林 , 詹宇 , 王慧 , 肖逸凡 , 杨丽丽 , 刘佳奇 , 蒯正龙 . 太湖沿岸浅水湖泊生态修复过程中生态系统健康评价[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024 , 2024(1) : 17 -28 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2024.01.003

Abstract

To judge ecosystem health of the shallow lakes along the shores of Taihu Lake in the process of ecological restoration, water body of Jinshugang polder was investigated during 2022. The comprehensive assessment index system of water ecological health was constructed, consisting of the target layer, criterion layer, and index layer, of which the criterion layer was composed of three items: function, integrity, and stability. The index layer was composed of 14 major items such as comprehensive water quality and nutritional status and 28 small items such as pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen. The results showed that during the process of ecological restoration, functional evaluation index reached the highest in autumn, integrity evaluation index was better than that in spring and summer, stability evaluation index was the best in summer, with 70% of the points at the “healthy” level, and the comprehensive evaluation index of aquatic ecological health continued to increase. The results and system of comprehensive evaluation of water ecological health formulated for shallow lakes in Taihu Lake are not only important for subsequent restoration and management, but also provide a reference for water ecological restoration and evaluation of other lakes.

参考文献

1 秦伯强.. 浅水湖泊湖沼学与太湖富营养化控制研究. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32 (5): 1229- 1243.
2 WANG Y G, GUO Y Q, ZHAO Y X, et al.. Spatiotemporal heterogeneities and driving factors of water quality and trophic state of a typical urban shallow lake (Taihu, China).. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2022, 29 (35): 53831- 53843.
3 CHEN X, WANG Y H, CAI Z C, et al.. Effects of land-use and land-cover change on nitrogen transport in Northern Taihu Basin, China during 1990–2017. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (9): 3895.
4 徐红玲, 潘继征, 徐力刚, 等.. 太湖流域湖荡湿地生态系统健康评价. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31 (5): 1279- 1288.
5 KARR J R.. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 1981, 6 (6): 21- 27.
6 卢志娟, 裴洪平, 汪勇.. 西湖生态系统健康评价初探. 湖泊科学, 2008, (6): 802- 805.
7 LIN L, WANG F F, CHEN H, et al.. Ecological health assessments of rivers with multiple dams based on the biological integrity of phytoplankton: A case study of North Creek of Jiulong River. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 121, 106998.
8 ZHANG H Y, DUAN Z D, WANG Z Y, et al.. Freshwater lake ecosystem health assessment and its response to pollution stresses based on planktonic index of biotic integrity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26 (34): 35240- 35252.
9 WU J Y, HE Y J, ZHAO Y J, et al.. A simple index of lake ecosystem health based on species-area models of macrobenthos. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19 (15): 9678.
10 李锋民, 陈琳, 姜晓华, 等.. 水质净化与生态修复的水生植物优选指标体系构建. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30 (12): 2411- 2422.
11 李春华, 叶春, 赵晓峰, 等.. 太湖湖滨带生态系统健康评价. 生态学报, 2012, 32 (12): 3806- 3815.
12 HUANG X Y, XU J, LIU B, et al.. Assessment of aquatic ecosystem health with indices of biotic integrity (IBIs) in the Ganjiang River system, China. Water, 2022, 14 (3): 278.
13 PADUA SHELTON, KRIPA V, PREMA D, et al. Assessment of ecosystem health of a micro-level Ramsar coastal zone in the Vembanad Lake, Kerala, India [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 195(1).
14 ZHANG Y H, ZHU H Y, LI B, et al.. Aquatic ecosystem health assessment of Poyang Lake through extension evaluation method. Water, 2021, 13 (2): 211.
15 US EPA. National rivers and streams assessment 2018/19: Field operations manual wadeable: EPA-841-B-17-003a [S]. Washington DC: Office of Water, 2018.
16 GRIFFITHS M. 欧盟水框架指令手册 [M]. 高兴洪, 译. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2008.
17 LEE S W, HWANG S J, LEE J K, et al.. Overview and application of the national aquatic ecological monitoring program (NAEMP) in Korea. Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology, 2011, 47, S3- S14.
18 中国水利部. 河湖健康评估技术导则: SL/T 793—2020 [S/OL]. (2020-06-05)[2023-04-05]. https://www.nssi.org.cn/nssi/front/111846850.html.
19 金相灿, 屠清瑛. 湖泊富营养化调查规范 [M]. 2版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990: 301.
20 叶润, 刘芳竹, 刘剑, 等.. 微波消解-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定大米中铜、锰、铁、锌、钙、镁、钾、钠 8 种元素. 食品科学, 2014, 35 (6): 117- 120.
21 陈元, 赵洋甬, 潘双叶, 等.. PHYTO-PAM对浮游植物中叶绿素的分类测定. 现代科学仪器, 2009, (4): 100- 103.
22 ZHU H, LIU X G, CHENG S P.. Phytoplankton community structure and water quality assessment in an ecological restoration area of Baiyangdian Lake, China. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 18, 1529- 1536.
23 STAMOU G, MAZARIS A D, MOUSTAKA-GOUNI M, et al.. Introducing a zooplanktonic index for assessing water quality of natural lakes in the Mediterranean region. Ecological Informatics, 2022, 69, 101616.
24 王佩, 卢少勇, 王殿武, 等.. 太湖湖滨带底泥氮、磷、有机质分布与污染评价. 中国环境科学, 2012, 32 (4): 703- 709.
25 赵永晶, 王洪铸, 崔永德.. 巢湖沿岸带底栖动物群落结构及其环境质量评价. 海洋与湖沼, 2020, 51 (3): 520- 527.
26 张群, 刘家霖, 朱义, 等.. 城市中小河道沉水植物盖度和生物量计算方法——基于上海市的调查分析. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34 (2): 445- 454.
27 张型东. 鄱阳湖生态系统空间结构与湿地功能分析及稳定性评价 [D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2016.
28 WANG J L, FU Z S, QIAO H X, et al.. Assessment of eutrophication and water quality in the estuarine area of Lake Wuli, Lake Taihu, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650, 1392- 1402.
29 WU T, WANG S R, SU B L, et al.. Understanding the water quality change of the Yilong Lake based on comprehensive assessment methods. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 126, 107714.
30 邹伟, 朱广伟, 蔡永久, 等.. 综合营养状态指数(TLI)在夏季长江中下游湖库评价中的局限及改进意见. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32 (1): 36- 47.
31 史静, 于秀芳, 夏运生, 等.. 影响富营养化湖泊底泥氮、磷释放的因素. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36 (3): 241- 244.
32 ZHAO Q J, WANG Q Y.. Water ecosystem service quality evaluation and value assessment of Taihu Lake in China. Water, 2021, 13 (5): 618.
33 闫人华, 高俊峰, 黄琪, 等.. 太湖流域圩区水生态系统服务功能价值. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (15): 5197- 5206.
34 吕学研, 陈桥, 蔡琨, 等.. 江苏太湖流域水生态环境功能区质量评价方法. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43 (12): 202- 210.
35 崔丹, 李莹, 陈体达, 等.. 上海市鲁迅公园浮游植物群落结构分析及评价. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, (3): 27- 38.
36 胡朋成. 太阳山湿地生态系统稳定性研究 [D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
37 袁静文, 武辰, 杜博, 等.. 高分五号高光谱遥感影像的城市土地利用景观格局分析. 遥感学报, 2020, 24 (4): 465- 478.
38 张雯, 黄民生, 张廷辉, 等. 太湖湖滨带生态系统健康评价及其修复模式探讨 [J]. 水生态学杂志, 2020, 41(4): 48-54.
文章导航

/