收稿日期: 2022-12-07
网络出版日期: 2024-07-23
基金资助
国家自然科学基金 (11965020)
Impact of ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet experimental data on CT18NNLO parton distribution functions
Received date: 2022-12-07
Online published: 2024-07-23
通过ePump (error PDF (parton distribution function) updating method package)研究了大型强子对撞机(large hadron collider, LHC)在质心能量
徐颖 , 范红豪 , 沙依甫加马力·达吾来提 . ATLAS 2.76 TeV单喷注实验数据对CT18NNLO部分子分布函数的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024 , 2024(4) : 30 -39 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2024.04.003
This study aimed to investigate the impact of the inclusive jet double differential cross-section data retrieved from the ATLAS at the large hadron collider(LHC), at the center-of-mass energy of
1 | GAO J, GUZZI M, HUSTON J, et al.. CT10 next-to-next-to-leading order global analysis of QCD. Physical Review D, 2014, 89 (3): 3009- 3037. |
2 | DULAT S, HOU T J, GAO J, et al.. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics. Physical Review D, 2016, 93 (3): 3006- 3045. |
3 | HOU T J, GAO J, HOOBS T J, et al.. New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC. Physical Review D, 2021, 103 (1): 4013- 4102. |
4 | MARTIN A D, STIRLING W J, THORNE R S, et al.. Parton distributions for the LHC. The European Physical Journal C, 2009, 63 (2): 189- 285. |
5 | GIELE W T, KELLER S.. Implications of hadron collider observables on parton distribution function uncertainties. Physical Review D, 1998, 58 (9): 094023. |
6 | PUMPLIN J, STUMP D, BROCK R, et al.. Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions. II. The Hessian method. Physical Review D, 2001, 65 (1): 014013. |
7 | SCHMIDT C, PUMPLIN J, YUAN C P.. Updating and optimizing error parton distribution function sets in the Hessian approach. Physical Review D, 2018, 98 (9): 4005- 4028. |
8 | HOU T J, YU Z, DULAT S, et al.. Updating and optimizing error parton distribution function sets in the Hessian approach. II. Physical Review D, 2019, 100 (11): 4024- 4050. |
9 | ABLAT A, DULAT S, RASHIDIN R, et al.. The impact of single top data on CT14nnlo PDFs. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2020, 59 (10): 3023- 3031. |
10 | JANDAOLET Q, ABLAT A, OBUL P, et al.. ResBos and ePump analysis on ATLAS 8 TeV Z Boson transverse momentum distributions. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2021, 60 (8): 3013- 3023. |
11 | KHACHATRYAN V, SIRUNYAN A M, TUMASYAN A, et al.. Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=2.76\;\text{TeV} $. The European Physical Journal C, 2016, 76 (5): 265. |
12 | ATLAS Collaboration.. Measurement of the inclusive jet cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=2.76\;\text{TeV} $ and comparison to the inclusive jet cross-section at $ \sqrt{{s}}=7\;\text{TeV} $ using the ATLAS detector. The European Physical Journal C, 2013, 73 (8): 2509. |
13 | CHATRCHYAN S, KHACHATRYAN V, SIRUNYAN A M, et al.. Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=7\;\text{TeV} $. Physical Review Letters, 2011, 107 (13): 132001. |
14 | ATLAS Collaboration.. Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector. The European Physical Journal C, 2011, 71 (2): 1512. |
15 | CMS Collaboration.. Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton–proton collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=13\;\text{TeV} $. The European Physical Journal C, 2016, 76 (8): 451. |
16 | ATLAS Collaboration.. Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=13\;\text{TeV} $ with the ATLAS detector. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018, 2018 (5): 195. |
17 | CMS Collaboration.. Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=8\;\text{TeV} $ and cross section ratios to 2.76 and 7 TeV. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, 2017 (3): 156. |
18 | CATANI S, DOKSHITZER Y L, SEYMOUR M H, et al. Longitudinally-invariant k⊥-clustering algorithms for hadron-hadron collisions [J]. Nuclear Physics B, 1993, 406(1/2): 187–224. |
19 | DOKSHITZER Y L, LEDER G D, MORETTI S, et al.. Better jet clustering algorithms. Journal of High Energy Physics, 1997, 1997, (8): 001. |
20 | CACCIARI M, SALAM G P, SOYEZ G.. The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008, (4): 063. |
21 | NAGY Z.. Next-to-leading order calculation of three-jet observables in hadron-hadron collisions. Physical Review D, 2003, 68 (9): 094002. |
22 | CARLI T, CLEMENTS D, COOPER S A, et al.. A posteriori inclusion of parton density functions in NLO QCD final-state calculations at hadron colliders: The APPLGRID project. The European Physical Journal C, 2010, 66 (3/4): 503- 524. |
23 | NADOLSKY P M, LAI H L, CAO Q H, et al.. Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables. Physical Review D, 2008, 78 (1): 013004. |
24 | DULAT S, HOU T J, GAO J, et al.. Intrinsic charm parton distribution functions from CTEQ-TEA global analysis. Physical Review D, 2014, 89 (7): 073004. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |