环境过程与机理

上海餐厨垃圾处理及有机肥介导的土壤微塑料污染

  • 刘燕 ,
  • 邱荣 ,
  • 曹潇慕 ,
  • 梁雨晴 ,
  • 曹雪龙 ,
  • 何德富
展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学 生态与环境科学学院, 上海 200241
    2. 华东师范大学 上海有机固废生物转化工程技术研究中心, 上海 200241
第一联系人:

共同第一作者

何德富, 副教授, 博士生导师, 研究方向为新污染物. E-mail: dfhe@des.ecnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-08-02

  录用日期: 2024-09-10

  网络出版日期: 2024-11-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金 (42277273)

Microplastic pollution in soil mediated by organic fertilizers derived from kitchen waste treatment in Shanghai

  • Yan LIU ,
  • Rong QIU ,
  • Xiaomu CAO ,
  • Yuqing LIANG ,
  • Xuelong CAO ,
  • Defu HE
Expand
  • 1. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
    2. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Biotransformation of Organic Solid Waste, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Received date: 2024-08-02

  Accepted date: 2024-09-10

  Online published: 2024-11-29

摘要

分别以上海黎明资源回用有限公司和上海文鑫生物科技有限公司大型垃圾处理基地为例, 研究了餐厨垃圾厌氧和好氧处理过程中产生的微塑料 (MPs), 并进一步跟踪处理后产生的有机肥产品及其施用后农田土壤中的微塑料, 以揭示微塑料的污染特征和环境归趋. 结果显示, 餐厨垃圾的厌氧和好氧处理过程中均存在微塑料, 主要为透明或黑色纤维形状, 以小于 1 mm尺寸为主, 主要成分为聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯 (PET) 和人造丝 (Rayon). 厌氧处理前样品中微塑料的平均丰度为40.0 ~ 546.7 items/kg, 而处理后的沼液和沼渣中微塑料的丰度分别显著降低了75.53%和54.41%. 好氧处理前的垃圾和稻壳中微塑料的平均丰度分别为53.3 ~ 493.3 items/kg和66.7 ~ 566.7 items/kg, 而处理后的有机肥中微塑料丰度提高了46.84%. 施用有机肥的土壤中微塑料的平均丰度达到 (176.7 ± 34.8) items/kg, 比未施用有机肥的土壤显著提高了137%. 这些结果表明, 城市餐厨垃圾处理过程可产生微塑料, 并能通过有机肥介导加剧土壤微塑料污染.

本文引用格式

刘燕 , 邱荣 , 曹潇慕 , 梁雨晴 , 曹雪龙 , 何德富 . 上海餐厨垃圾处理及有机肥介导的土壤微塑料污染[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024 , 2024(6) : 114 -123 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2024.06.010

Abstract

The occurrence of microplastics (MPs) during anaerobic and aerobic treatment processes of kitchen waste was investigated using case studies from the prominent waste treatment facilities of Shanghai Liming Resources Recycling Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Wenxin Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The presence of MPs in the resulting organic fertilizers and the agricultural soils fertilized with these products were further tracked to reveal the pollution characteristics and environmental fate of MPs. Results showed that MPs were present in both anaerobic and aerobic kitchen waste treatment processes, primarily as transparent or black fibers under 1 mm in size and composed predominantly of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or Rayon. Before anaerobic treatment, the average abundance of MPs in the samples ranged from 40.0 to 546.7 items/kg, whereas, after treatment, the average abundance of MPs in the biogas slurry and biogas residue decreased significantly by 75.53% and 54.41%, respectively. The average abundance of MPs in waste and rice husks before aerobic treatment ranged from 53.3 to 493.3 items/kg and 66.7 to 566.7 items/kg, respectively, whereas, that in organic fertilizers was increased by 46.84%. The average abundance of MPs in the soil with organic fertilizers was (176.7 ± 34.8) items/kg, which was 137% higher than that of the soil without organic fertilizers. These results indicate that MPs can be produced in the process of municipal food waste treatment, and the pollution of soil MPs can be exacerbated through organic fertilizers.

参考文献

1 王姣姣, 杨小明, 王力, 等.. 我国厨余垃圾管理现状及提高资源化利用水平的对策建议. 再生资源与循环经济, 2024, 7 (3): 7- 11.
2 胡钢, 孙建亭, 刘思源, 等.. 厨余垃圾湿式与干式厌氧消化处理全链条碳排放比较分析. 环境生态学, 2024, 6 (5): 146- 150.
3 MU L, ZHANG L, ZHU K, et al.. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, food waste and yard waste: Synergistic enhancement on process stability and biogas production. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 704, 135429.
4 WANG P, QIAO Z, LI X, et al.. Functional characteristic of microbial communities in large-scale biotreatment systems of food waste. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 746, 141086.
5 LIN X, WANG S, NI R, et al.. New insights on municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill plastisphere structure and function. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 888, 163823.
6 SCHMALTZ E, MELVIN E C, DIANA Z, et al.. Plastic pollution solutions: Emerging technologies to prevent and collect marine plastic pollution. Environment International, 2020, 144, 106067.
7 杨越, 陈玲, 薛澜.. 海洋垃圾和塑料污染防治迈向全球治理新阶段. 中华环境, 2023, (9): 30- 32.
8 骆永明, 施华宏, 涂晨, 等.. 环境中微塑料研究进展与展望. 科学通报, 2021, 66, 1547- 1562.
9 ZHANG K, SHI H, PENG J, et al.. Microplastic pollution in China’s inland water systems: A review of findings, methods, characteristics, effects, and management. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630, 1641- 1653.
10 HE D, ZHANG Y, GAO W.. Micro(nano)plastic contaminations from soils to plants: Human food risk. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2021, 41, 116- 121.
11 CHEN Y, LI X, GAO W, et al.. Microfiber-loaded bacterial community in indoor fallout and air-conditioner filter dust. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 856, 159211.
12 HU J, HE D, ZHANG X, et al.. National-scale distribution of micro(meso)plastics in farmland soils across China: Implications for environmental impacts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 424, 127283.
13 LIANG Y, CAO X, MO A, et al.. Micro (nano) plastics in plant-derived food: Source, contamination pathways and human exposure risks. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 165, 117138.
14 SU Y, ZHANG Z, WU D, et al.. Occurrence of microplastics in landfill systems and their fate with landfill age. Water Research, 2019, 164, 114968.
15 林伟雄, 武纯.. 城市污泥中微塑料的研究现状. 广东化工, 2023, 50 (18): 59- 61.
16 YANG Z, FAN Lü, ZHANG H, et al.. Is incineration the terminator of plastics and microplastics?. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 401, 123429.
17 LUO J, ZHANG Q, ZHA J, et al.. Potential influences of exogenous pollutants occurred in waste activated sludge on anaerobic digestion: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 383, 121176.
18 LYU W, ZHOU W, LU S, et al.. Microplastic pollution in rice-fish co-culture system: A report of three farmland stations in Shanghai, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 652, 1209- 1218.
19 李子瑜, 李镇州, 窦玉婷, 等.. 异源物质对餐厨垃圾厌氧消化效能的影响及调控策略. 环境工程, 2023, 41 (6): 222- 232.
20 LUO T, DAI X, WEI W, et al.. Microplastics enhance the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in anaerobic sludge digestion by enriching antibiotic-resistant bacteria in surface biofilm and facilitating the vertical and horizontal gene transfer. Environmental Science Technology, 2023, 57 (39): 14611- 14621..
21 LIU S, SU C, LU Y, et al.. Effects of microplastics on the properties of different types of sewage sludge and strategies to overcome the inhibition: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 902, 166033.
22 JACHIMOWICZ P, JO Y, CYDZIK-KWIATKOWSKA A.. Polyethylene microplastics increase extracellular polymeric substances production in aerobic granular sludge. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 851, 158208.
23 LI L, SONG K, YEERKEN S, et al.. Effect evaluation of microplastics on activated sludge nitrification and denitrification. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 707, 135953.
24 QIN R, SU C, LIU W, et al.. Effects of exposure to polyether sulfone microplastic on the nitrifying process and microbial community structure in aerobic granular sludge. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 302, 122827.
25 LE V G, NGUYEN M K, NGUYEN H L, et al.. A comprehensive review of micro-and nano-plastics in the atmosphere: Occurrence, fate, toxicity, and strategies for risk reduction. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 904, 166649.
26 KYRIAKOUDES G, TURNER A.. Suspended and deposited microplastics in the coastal atmosphere of southwest England. Chemosphere, 2023, 343 (1): 40258.
27 LIU P, LIAO H, DENG Y, et al.. Microplastic pollution and its potential correlation with environmental factors in Daya Bay, South China Sea. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11 (7): 1465.
28 JIE F, ZHOU Y, CHUN X, et al.. Investigation of microplastics distribution characteristics in Qinhuangdao sea area based on transmission path. Marine Environmental Science, 2023, 42 (1): 80- 88.
29 孙香莹, 庄银, 王玉邦, 等.. 微塑料环境暴露与人体健康效应研究进展. 环境科学研究, 2023, 36 (5): 1020- 1031.
30 GüZEL ?ZMIRLI ?, G?KKAYA A. Microplastic pollution and risk assessment in packaged teas in Türkiye [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2024, 235(7): 438.
31 FADARE O O, WAN B, ZHAO L, et al.. Microplastics from consumer plastic food containers: Are we consuming it?. Chemosphere, 2020, 253, 126787.
32 SOBHANI Z, LEI Y, TANG Y, et al.. Microplastics generated when opening plastic packaging. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 4841.
33 LIN X, ZHANG S, YANG S, et al.. A landfill serves as a critical source of microplastic pollution and harbors diverse plastic biodegradation microbial species and enzymes: Study in large-scale landfills China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 457, 131676.
34 EDO C, FERNANDEZ-PINAS F, ROSAL R.. Microplastics identification and quantification in the composted Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 813, 151902.
35 刘加强, 崔陆, 周子振, 等.. 土壤中微塑料: 类型、载体效应、迁移行为和潜在风险综述. 生态学报, 2024, 44 (9): 3586- 3599.
36 WEITHMANN N, M?LLER J N, L?DER M G J, et al.. Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment. Science Advances, 2018, 4 (4): eaap8060.
37 ZHANG J, LI Z, ZHOU X, et al.. Long-term application of organic compost is the primary contributor to microplastic pollution of soils in a wheat-maize rotation. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 866, 161123.
38 张文婷, 唐成瑞, 彭柏, 等.. 微塑料对土壤及植物的影响综述. 南方农业, 2024, 18 (4): 85- 87.
39 曹霞飞, 雷燕, 肖剑.. 食品中微塑料的污染现状与健康风险. 现代食品, 2022, 28 (23): 20- 25.
文章导航

/