上海不同落叶树种展叶物候的影响因素

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2023.06.012

华东师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 2023 ›› Issue (6): 125-133.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2023.06.012

• 生态与环境科学 • 上一篇

上海不同落叶树种展叶物候的影响因素

张芽茹^1,², 庞育兰^1,², 罗心怡^1,², 徐嘉艺^1,², 杨颜溢^1,², 达良俊^1,^2,^3,⁴, 宋坤^1,^2,^3,^4,*()

1. 华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院, 上海　200241
2. 华东师范大学上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室, 上海　200241
3. 自然资源部大都市区国土空间生态修复工程创新中心, 上海　200062
4. 崇明生态研究院, 上海　202162

收稿日期:2022-11-22 接受日期:2023-03-16 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-11-23
通讯作者: 宋坤 E-mail:ksong@des.ecnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
上海市科委项目 (22DZ1202102, 22DZ1208502)

Driving factors of leaf-unfolding phenology in deciduous trees in Shanghai

Yaru ZHANG^1,², Yulan PANG^1,², Xinyi LUO^1,², Jiayi XU^1,², Yanyi YANG^1,², Liangjun DA^1,^2,^3,⁴, Kun SONG^1,^2,^3,^4,*()

1. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China
2. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China
3. Technology Innovation Center for Land Spatial Eco-Restoration in Metropolitan Area, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shanghai　200062, China
4. Institute of Eco-Chongming, Shanghai　202162, China

Received:2022-11-22 Accepted:2023-03-16 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-11-23
Contact: Kun SONG E-mail:ksong@des.ecnu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究城市环境差异对树木展叶物候的影响, 以上海城市森林中的纯林为研究对象, 利用遥感数据提取9种树木的展叶开始时间, 并分析其与温度、降水和夜间灯光之间的关系. 结果显示如下. ① 展叶时间在物种之间存在差异, 平均展叶时间从第95天至第104天; 相比之下, 展叶时间的种内差异更大, 最早为第69天, 最晚为第138天. ② 不同物种展叶物候对环境因子的响应不同: 乌桕对降水变化最敏感, 复羽叶栾对降水变化和城市化水平敏感, 池杉对降水和温度变化敏感, 其余6种树木对环境变化不敏感. ③ 对于敏感物种, 生长季前的平均降水量从48 mm增加64 mm, 展叶开始时间提前45 d; 平均温度每增加1℃, 展叶开始时间延迟3 d. 因而, 城市森林建设可以根据树种物候的环境响应特点来进行合理配置, 使其能更好地适应环境, 发挥相应的生态作用.

关键词: 人工纯林, 展叶时间, 种间差异, 影响因素

Abstract:

To investigate the influence of urban environmental differences on the leaf-unfolding phenology of trees, we extracted the leaf unfolding information of nine tree species using remote sensing data and analyzed their relationships with temperature, precipitation, and nighttime light in a pure forest in Shanghai. The results showed that : ① there were significant differences in the average onset of the leaf-unfolding phenology among species, from 95th to 104th day of the year; contrastingly, intra-species variation in leaf-unfolding date was greater, ranging from 69th to 138th day of the year. ② Different species exhibited different leaf phenology in response to environmental factors. Triadica sebifera was the most sensitive to precipitation changes, Taxodium distichum var. imbricatum was sensitive to precipitation changes and urbanization, and Koelreuteria bipinnata was sensitive to precipitation and climate changes. Other species were not sensitive to any environmental changes. ③ For species sensitive to environmental changes, the leaf-unfolding date was 45 days earlier when the average precipitation increase from 48 mm to 64 mm, and delayed by three days for every 1°C increase in average temperature before the growing season. The study showed that urban forest construction can be reasonably configured according to the response characteristics of a species to the environment, so that plants can better adapt to the environment and fulfill their roles in the ecosystem.

Key words: pure forest plantation, leaf-unfolding date, interspecific variation, influence factors

中图分类号:

Q948

张芽茹, 庞育兰, 罗心怡, 徐嘉艺, 杨颜溢, 达良俊, 宋坤. 上海不同落叶树种展叶物候的影响因素[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 2023(6): 125-133.

Yaru ZHANG, Yulan PANG, Xinyi LUO, Jiayi XU, Yanyi YANG, Liangjun DA, Kun SONG. Driving factors of leaf-unfolding phenology in deciduous trees in Shanghai[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(6): 125-133.

图/表 3

图1

图2

表1

参考文献 51

1	POLGAR C A, PRIMACK R B. Leaf out phenology in temperate forests [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2013, 21(1): 111-116.
2	QIU T, SONG C, ZHANG Y, et al.. Urbanization and climate change jointly shift land surface phenology in the northern mid-latitude large cities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 236, 111477.
3	WANG Y, XU S, LI B, et al.. Responses of spring leaf phenological and functional traits of two urban tree species to air warming and/or elevated ozone. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2022, 179, 158- 167.
4	MENG L, MAO J, ZHOU Y, et al.. Urban warming advances spring phenology but reduces the response of phenology to temperature in the conterminous United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 117 (8): 4228- 4233.
5	GE Q, WANG H, RUTISHAUSER T, et al.. Phenological response to climate change in China: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21 (1): 265- 274.
6	付永硕, 李昕熹, 周轩成, 等.. 全球变化背景下的植物物候模型研究进展与展望. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50 (9): 1206- 1218.
7	INOUE S, DANG Q, MAN R, et al.. Photoperiod, [CO₂] and soil moisture interactively affect phenology in trembling aspen: Implications to climate change-induced migration . Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2020, 180, 104269.
8	PIAO S, LIU Q, CHEN A, et al.. Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25 (6): 1922- 1940.
9	高成蹊, 王焕炯, 葛全胜.. 增温和光周期变化对温带典型木本植物展叶始期的影响. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41 (3): 451- 460.
10	WANG S, YANG B, YANG Q, et al.. Temporal trends and spatial variability of vegetation phenology over the Northern Hemisphere during 1982-2012. PLoS One, 2016, 11 (6): e0157134.
11	朱旭斌, 刘娅梅, 孙书存.. 南京地区落叶栎林主要木本植物的展叶动态研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29 (1): 128- 136.
12	代武君, 金慧颖, 张玉红, 等.. 植物物候学研究进展. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (19): 6705- 6719.
13	NEIL K, WU J.. Effects of urbanization on plant flowering phenology: A review. Urban Ecosystems, 2006, 9 (3): 243- 257.
14	JIA W, ZHAO S, ZHANG X, et al.. Urbanization imprint on land surface phenology: The urban-rural gradient analysis for Chinese cities. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27 (12): 2895- 2904.
15	ZHOU D, ZHAO S, ZHANG L, et al.. Remotely sensed assessment of urbanization effects on vegetation phenology in China’s 32 major cities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 176, 272- 281.
16	ZHOU Y.. Understanding urban plant phenology for sustainable cities and planet. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12 (4): 302- 304.
17	蔡红艳, 杨小唤, 张树文.. 植物物候对城市热岛响应的研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33 (1): 221- 228.
18	孟丹, 刘芯蕊, 张聪聪.. 北京市植物物候对热岛效应的响应. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40 (3): 844- 854.
19	JEONG S, PARK H, HO C, et al.. Impact of urbanization on spring and autumn phenology of deciduous trees in the Seoul Capital Area, South Korea. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2019, 63 (5): 627- 637.
20	GASTON K J, DUFFY J P, GASTON S, et al.. Human alteration of natural light cycles: Causes and ecological consequences. Oecologia, 2014, 176 (4): 917- 931.
21	FFRENCH CONSTANT R H, SOMERS YEATES R, BENNIE J, et al.. Light pollution is associated with earlier tree budburst across the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 283 (1833): 20160813.
22	REN P, LIU Z, ZHOU X, et al.. Strong controls of daily minimum temperature on the autumn photosynthetic phenology of subtropical vegetation in China. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8 (1): 31.
23	LI X, FU Y, CHEN S, et al.. Increasing importance of precipitation in spring phenology with decreasing latitudes in subtropical forest area in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021, 304/305, 108427.
24	张晓萱, 崔耀平, 刘素洁, 等.. 自然植被物候遥感提取精度评估. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38 (5): 1589- 1599.
25	崔林丽, 史军, 杜华强.. 植被物候的遥感提取及其影响因素研究进展. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36 (1): 9- 16.
26	付永硕, 张晶, 吴兆飞, 等.. 中国植被物候研究进展及展望. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 58 (3): 424- 433.
27	PRIMACK R, IBÁÑEZ I, HIGUCHI H, et al.. Spatial and interspecific variability in phenological responses to warming temperatures. Biological Conservation, 2009, 142, 2569- 2577.
28	代奎, 曾秀, 王鑫洋, 等.. 春季增温对亚热带木本植物物候和生长的影响. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40 (12): 3881- 3889.
29	郭雪艳. 上海城市森林多尺度生态质量评价研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2017.
30	罗心怡, 郭雪艳, 高志文, 等.. 上海城市森林区系组成及不同植被类型物种多样性差异. 园林, 2021, 38 (10): 19- 26.
31	仇宽彪, 张慧, 高吉喜, 等.. 上海城市林地斑块冷岛效应的城乡梯度变化. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40 (5): 1409- 1418.
32	张希金, 冷寒冰, 赵广琦, 等.. 上海 4 种常见绿化树种地上生物量模型构建. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42 (2): 141- 146.
33	胡植, 王焕炯, 戴君虎, 等.. 利用控制实验研究植物物候对气候变化的响应综述. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (23): 9119- 9129.
34	李嘉皓, 田波, 曹芳, 等.. 上海城市水体富营养化关键参量的遥感反演与时序分析. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, (1): 135- 147.
35	宋永昌. 城市生态学[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2000.
36	张龙, 格日乐图, 严靖, 等.. 长三角地区城市人工林主要乔木树种运用研究. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, (3): 39- 49.
37	王敏钰, 罗毅, 张正阳, 等.. 植被物候参数遥感提取与验证方法研究进展. 遥感学报, 2022, 26 (3): 431- 455.
38	KONG D, ZHANG Y, GU X, et al.. A robust method for reconstructing global MODIS EVI time series on the Google Earth Engine. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2019, 155, 13- 24.
39	DESCALS A, VERGER A, YIN G, et al.. A threshold method for robust and fast estimation of land-surface phenology using Google Earth Engine. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14, 601- 606.
40	WHITE M A, THORNTON P E, RUNNING S W.. A continental phenology model for monitoring vegetation responses to interannual climatic variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1997, 11 (2): 217- 234.
41	DESANKER G, DAHLIN K M, FINLEY A O.. Environmental controls on landsat-derived phenoregions across an East African megatransect. Ecosphere, 2020, 11 (5): e03143.
42	VERBESSELT J, ZEILEIS A, HEROLD M.. Near real-time disturbance detection using satellite image time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 123, 98- 108.
43	ESTAY S, CHÁVEZ R. Npphen: An R-package for non-parametric reconstruction of vegetation phenology and anomaly detection using remote sensing [EB/OL]. (2018-04-14)[2022-10-01]. https://doi.org/10.1101/301143.
44	王华, 周玉科, 王笑影, 等.. 东北植被生长峰值特征的变化及对气候和物候的响应. 遥感技术与应用, 2021, 36 (2): 441- 452.
45	丛楠, 张扬建, 朱军涛.. 北半球中高纬度地区近30年植被春季物候温度敏感性. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46 (2): 125- 135.
46	ZHANG X, ZHOU J, LIANG S, et al.. A practical reanalysis data and thermal infrared remote sensing data merging (RTM) method for reconstruction of a 1-km all-weather land surface temperature. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 260, 112437.
47	PENG S, DING Y, WEN Z, et al.. Spatiotemporal change and trend analysis of potential evapotranspiration over the Loess Plateau of China during 2011-2100. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 233, 183- 194.
48	LI D, STUCKY B J, BAISER B, et al.. Urbanization delays plant leaf senescence and extends growing season length in cold but not in warm areas of the Northern Hemisphere. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2022, 31 (2): 308- 320.
49	李莹, 陈永滨, 范辉华, 等.. 福建19种主要造林乡土阔叶树种光响应曲线特性分析. 西部林业科学, 2020, 49 (1): 59- 64.
50	张迎辉, 王雪梅, 连巧霞.. 5个彩叶树种光响应曲线特性研究. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40 (9): 1737- 1741.
51	朱丽薇, 赵秀华, 胡彦婷, 等.. 气候过渡区环孔材和散孔材树种的水分利用特征. 生态科学, 2017, 36 (3): 1- 7.

	展叶开始时间 (lgS)
	乌桕	复羽叶栾	池杉	枫香树	加杨	榉树	无患子	水杉	银杏
生长季前的平均温度(℃)	—	—	0.010*	—	—	—	—	—	—
生长季前的平均降水量(mm)	–0.010**	–0.010**	–0.010**	ns	—	ns	ns	—	—
生长季前的平均灯光亮度	—	ns	ns	—	ns	—	—	—	—
距中心城区距离(m)	—	0.000*	ns	—	—	—	—	—	—
距海岸线距离(m)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
截距	2.64**	2.38**	2.39**	2.66**	2.00**	2.12**	2.19**	1.97**	1.98**
样本量	24	114	48	22	24	103	52	82	50
决定系数(R²)	0.33	0.14	0.28	0.14	0.09	0.02	0.05	0.00	0.00
校正决定系数	0.30	0.12	0.21	0.1	0.04	0.01	0.03	0.00	0.00
残差标准误差	0.04 (df = 22)	0.05 (df = 110)	0.04 (df = 43)	0.05 (df = 20)	0.04 (df = 22)	0.04 (df = 101)	0.04 (df = 50)	0.05 (df = 81)	0.06 (df = 49)
F 检验	10.91** (df = 1;22)	5.97** (df = 3;110)	4.18** (df = 4;43)	3.28 (df = 1;20)	2.06 (df = 1;22)	2.34 (df = 1;101)	2.38 (df = 1;50)

[1]	祁秋艳，杨淑慧，仲启铖，张超，王开运. 崇明东滩芦苇光合特征对模拟增温的响应[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 20120, 2012(6): 29-38.
[2]	李根, 谢伊涵, 王话翔, 杨凯. 太浦河水源地沿线石油类污染特征与影响因素分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 2020(6): 144-153.
[3]	吴程程，田浩廷，赵雅萍. 载Fe(Ⅲ)树脂除氟性能的研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 2011(6): 36-46,74.

上海不同落叶树种展叶物候的影响因素

Driving factors of leaf-unfolding phenology in deciduous trees in Shanghai

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 51

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价