回顾历史不难发现, 许多行业总会间歇性地产生一些破坏性创新技术. 值得注意的是, 那些提出新技术并实现产业化的企业, 通常不是技术和资金实力最强的在位龙头企业, 而是规模较小、技术实力不足的后发企业. 针对这种现象, 基于两阶段博弈模型进行了分析解释. 基于模型分析, 在位企业在传统技术方面的优势会阻碍其开展破坏性技术创新, 而后发企业能利用后发优势, 策略性地压低新技术产品的利润, 将在位企业阻挡在新产品市场以外.
Looking back on history, we observe that many industries generate disruptive innovations intermittently. It is worth noting that those who adopt new technologies for commercialization are usually not the incumbent leading companies with the strongest technical and financial strength, but rather companies that are established later in time, who operate on a smaller scale and with less technical strength. This article explains this phenomenon based on a two-stage game model. The advantages of incumbent companies in traditional technologies often become obstacles in their switch to innovative technologies. Companies established later in time can leverage the late-comer advantage to strategically reduce profits of new technology products, thereby blocking incumbent enterprises from the new product market.
[1] SCHUMPETER J A. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.
[2] CHRISTENSEN C M. The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence [J]. Business History Review, 1993, 67(4): 531-588
[3] DANNEELS E. Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2004, 21(4): 246-258
[4] O’REILLY III C A, TUSHMAN M L. The ambidextrous organization [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2004, 82(2): 74-81
[5] 陈劲, 戴凌燕, 李良德. 突破性创新及其识别 [J]. 科技管理研究, 2002(5): 22-28
[6] 郭政. 后发企业破坏性创新的机理与路径研究 [D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007.
[7] 宋建元. 成熟型大企业开展破坏性创新的机理与途径研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006.
[8] RIORDAN M H, WILLIAMSON O E. Asset specificity and economic organization [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1985, 3(4): 365-378
[9] 田红云. 破坏性创新与我国制造业国际竞争优势的构建 [D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007.
[10] CHRISTENSEN C M, OVERDORF M. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(2): 66-77
[11] NELSON R R, WINTER S G, SCHUETTE H L. Technical change in an evolutionary model [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976, 90(1): 90-118
[12] 马洁玲, 唐立倩, 李强. 柯达衰落的真实教训 [J]. 现代国企研究, 2016, 21: 66-69
[13] 陈司星. 柯达破产: 自满的代价 [J]. 国企, 2013(3): 116-123
[14] 顾问君. 柯达: 被 IT 击倒的巨人 [J]. 上海经济, 2012, 2(5): 24-26
中国综合性科技类核心期刊(北大核心)