Review Articles

Verifiable identification condition for nonignorable nonresponse data with categorical instrumental variables

Kenji Beppu ,

Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Kosuke Morikawa

Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

k.morikawa.es@osaka-u.ac.jp

Pages | Received 01 Apr. 2023, Accepted 25 Dec. 2023, Published online: 04 Jan. 2024,
  • Abstract
  • Full Article
  • References
  • Citations

We consider a model identification problem in which an outcome variable contains nonignorable missing values. Statistical inference requires a guarantee of the model identifiability to obtain estimators enjoying theoretically reasonable properties such as consistency and asymptotic normality. Recently, instrumental or shadow variables, combined with the completeness condition in the outcome model, have been highlighted to make a model identifiable. In this paper, we elucidate the relationship between the completeness condition and model identifiability when the instrumental variable is categorical. We first show that when both the outcome and instrumental variables are categorical, the two conditions are equivalent. However, when one of the outcome and instrumental variables is continuous, the completeness condition may not necessarily hold, even for simple models. Consequently, we provide a sufficient condition that guarantees the identifiability of models exhibiting a monotone-likelihood property, a condition particularly useful in instances where establishing the completeness condition poses significant challenges. Using observed data, we demonstrate that the proposed conditions are easy to check for many practical models and outline their usefulness in numerical experiments and real data analysis.

Your browser may not support PDF viewing. Please click to download the file.

References

  • Amini-Seresht, E., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2019). On asset allocation for a threshold model with dependent returns. European Actuarial Journal, 9(2), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-019-00210-4
  • Ariyafar, S., Tata, M., Rezapour, M., & Madadi, M. (2020). Comparison of aggregation, minimum and maximum of two risky portfolios with dependent claims. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 178, 104620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2020.104620
  • Balakrishnan, N., & Zhao, P. (2013). Ordering properties of order statistics from heterogeneous populations: A review with an emphasis on some recent developments. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 27(4), 403–443. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964813000156
  • Barmalzan, G., Najafabadi, A. T. P., & Balakrishnan, N. (2015). Stochastic comparison of aggregate claim amounts between two heterogeneous portfolios and its applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 61, 235–241.
  • Boonen, T. J., Cheung, K. C., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Bowley reinsurance with asymmetric information on the insurer's risk preferences. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2021(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2020.1867631
  • Cai, J., & Wei, W. (2014). Some new notions of dependence with applications in optimal allocation problems. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 55, 200–209.
  • Cai, J., & Wei, W. (2015). Notions of multivariate dependence and their applications in optimal portfolio selections with dependent risks. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 138, 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2014.12.011
  • Chen, R. (2003). Information economics. Nankai University Press.
  • Chen, Z., & Hu, T. (2008). Asset proportions in optimal portfolios with dependent default risks. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43(2), 223–226.
  • Cheung, K. C., & Yang, H. (2004). Ordering optimal proportions in the asset allocation problem with dependent default risks. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 35(3), 595–609.
  • Denuit, M., Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M., & Kaas, R. (2006). Actuarial theory for dependent risks: Measures, orders and models. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ding, W., Wang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Ordering properties of generalized aggregation with applications. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 37(2), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.v37.2
  • Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.005
  • Giovagnoli, A., & Wynn, H. P. (2011). (u, v)-ordering and a duality theorem for risk aversion and Lorenz-type orderings. Preprint, arXiv:1108.1019.
  • Hadar, J., & Seo, T. K. (1988). Asset proportions in optimal portfolios. The Review of Economic Studies, 55(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297395
  • Hagen, O. (1979). Towards a positive theory of preferences under risk. Springer.
  • Hennessy, D. A., & Lapan, H. E. (2002). The use of Archimedean copulas to model portfolio allocations. Mathematical Finance, 12(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.2002.12.issue-2
  • Kijima, M., & Ohnishi, M. (1996). Portfolio selection problems via the bivariate characterization of stochastic dominance relations. Mathematical Finance, 6(3), 237–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.1996.6.issue-3
  • Landsberger, M., & Meilijson, I. (1990). Demand for risky financial assets: A portfolio analysis. Journal of Economic Theory, 50(1), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(90)90092-X
  • Li, H., & Li, X. (2013). Stochastic orders in reliability and risk. Springer.
  • Li, X., & Li, C. (2016). On allocations to portfolios of assets with statistically dependent potential risk returns. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 68, 178–186.
  • Li, X., & You, Y. (2014). A note on allocation of portfolio shares of random assets with Archimedean copula. Annals of Operations Research, 212(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1137-y
  • Li, X., & You, Y. (2015). Permutation monotone functions of random vectors with applications in financial and actuarial risk management. Advances in Applied Probability, 47(1), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1239/aap/1427814591
  • Ma, C. (2000). Convex orders for linear combinations of random variables. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 84(1-2), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00143-3
  • Marshall, A. W., Olkin, I., & Arnold, B. C. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of majorization and its applications (Vol. 143). Springer.
  • Rinott, Y., Scarsini, M., & Yu, Y. (2012). A colonel blotto gladiator game. Mathematics of Operations Research, 37(4), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1120.0550
  • Scholes, M. S. (2000). Crisis and risk management. American Economic Review, 90(2), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.17
  • Shaked, M., & Shanthikumar, G. (2007). Stochastic orders. Springer Science Business Media.
  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
  • Xu, M., & Hu, T. (2012). Stochastic comparisons of capital allocations with applications. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50(3), 293–298.
  • Yan, R., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Optimal allocation of relevations in coherent systems. Journal of Applied Probability, 58(4), 1152–1169. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2021.23
  • You, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Functional characterizations of bivariate weak SAI with an application. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 64, 225–231.
  • Zhang, J., Yan, R., & Wang, J. (2022). Reliability optimization of parallel-series and series-parallel systems with statistically dependent components. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 102, 618–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.10.003
  • Zhang, J., Yan, R., & Zhang, Y. (2023a). Reliability analysis of fail-safe systems with heterogeneous and dependent components subject to random shocks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 237(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X221122033
  • Zhang, J., Yan, R., & Zhang, Y. (2023b). Stochastic comparisons of largest claim amount from heterogeneous and dependent insurance portfolios. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 431, 115265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2023.115265
  • Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). A copula-based approach on optimal allocation of hot standbys in series systems. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 69(6), 902–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.v69.6
  • Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Stochastic comparisons of relevation allocation policies in coherent systems. TEST, 32, 865–907.
  • Zhang, Y. (2022). Stochastic comparisons on total capacity of weighted k-out-of-n systems with heterogeneous components. Statistical Theory and Related Fields, 6(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2021.1894402
  • Zhang, Y., & Cheung, K. C. (2020). On the increasing convex order of generalized aggregation of dependent random variables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 92, 61–69.
  • Zhang, Y., Ding, W., & Zhao, P. (2018). On total capacity of k-out-of-n systems with random weights. Naval Research Logistics, 65(4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.v65.4
  • Zhang, Y., & Zhao, P. (2015). Comparisons on aggregate risks from two sets of heterogeneous portfolios. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 65, 124–135.

To cite this article: Kenji Beppu & Kosuke Morikawa (2024) Verifiable identification condition for nonignorable nonresponse data with categorical instrumental variables, Statistical Theory and Related Fields, 8:1, 40-50, DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2023.2300407

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2023.2300407