Review Articles

Quasi-Monte Carlo simulation of Brownian sheet with application to option pricing

Xinyu Song ,

Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

Yazhen Wang

Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

Pages 82-91 | Received 07 Mar. 2017, Accepted 17 May. 2017, Published online: 19 Jun. 2017,
  • Abstract
  • Full Article
  • References
  • Citations

ABSTRACT

Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods are widely used in scientific studies. As quasi-Monte Carlo simulations have advantage over ordinary Monte Carlo methods, this paper proposes a new quasi-Monte Carlo method to simulate Brownian sheet via its Karhunen–Loéve expansion. The proposed new approach allocates quasi-random sequences for the simulation of random components of the Karhunen–Loéve expansion by maximum reducing its variability. We apply the quasi-Monte Carlo approach to an option pricing problem for a class of interest rate models whose instantaneous forward rate driven by a different stochastic shock through Brownian sheet and we demonstrate the application with an empirical problem.

Your browser may not support PDF viewing. Please click to download the file.

References

  1. Acworth, P., Broadie, M., & Glasserman, P. (1996). A comparison of some Monte Carlo and Quasi Monte Carlo techniques for option pricing. M. Carlo & Q.-M. Carlo Methods, Springer[Google Scholar]
  2. Faure, H. (1982). Discrepence de suites associees a un systeme de numeration (en dimension s) Acta Arithmetica, 41, 337[Google Scholar]
  3. Halton, J. H. (1960). On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numerische Mathematik, 2, 8490[Google Scholar]
  4. Heath, D., Jarrow, R., & Morton, A. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica, 60(1), 77105[Google Scholar]
  5. Mallat, S. (2008). A wavelet tour of signal processing, third edition: The sparse way. Academic Press[Google Scholar]
  6. Morokoff, W. J., & Caisch, R. E. (1995). Quasi-Monte Carlo integration. Journal of Computational Physics, 122, 218230[Google Scholar]
  7. Niederreiter, H. (1973). Application of diophantine approximations to numerical integration. In C. F. Osgood, (Ed.), Diophantine approximation and its applications (pp. 129199). New York: Academic Press[Google Scholar]
  8. Niederreiter, H. (1978). Quasi-Monte Carlo methods and pseudo-random numbers. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 84, 9571041[Google Scholar]
  9. Niederreiter, H. (1988). Low-discrepancy and low-dispersion sequences. Journal of Number Theory, 30, 5170[Google Scholar]
  10. Niederreiter, H. (1988). Quasi-Monte Carlo methods for multidimensional numerical integration. In H. Brass & G. Hämmerlin (Eds.), Numerical integration III, international series of numerical math., (Vol. 85). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag[Google Scholar]
  11. Niederreiter, H. (1992). Random number generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Volume 63 of SIAM CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Philadelphia: SIAM[Google Scholar]
  12. Santa-Clara, P., & Sornette, D. (2001). The dynamics of the forward interest rate curve with stochastic string shocks. Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 149185[Google Scholar]
  13. Sobol’, I. M. (1967). On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximation evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 7(4), 86112[Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, X., & Fang, K.-T. (2003). Effective dimension and quasi-Monte Carlo integration. Journal of Complexity, 19, 101124[Google Scholar]