玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态间的光学介导纠缠

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2022.02.011

华东师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 2022 ›› Issue (2): 93-105.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2022.02.011

玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态间的光学介导纠缠

高帅¹, PRESTMatthew^1,², ILO-OKEKEEbubechukwu O.^2,³, KONDAPPANManikandan⁴, ARISTIZABAL-ZULUAGAJuan E.^1,², IVANNIKOVValentin^1,^5,^6,⁷, BYRNESTim^1,^5,^6,^7,*()

1. 华东师范大学精密光谱科学与技术国家重点实验室, 上海　200241
2. 上海纽约大学物理系, 上海　200122
3. 奥维里联邦科技大学理学院物理系, 伊莫州　460001, 尼日利亚
4. 安蒂奥基亚大学物理研究所精密科学与自然科学系，麦德林　05001000, 哥伦比亚
5. 华东师范大学-纽约大学物理联合研究中心,上海　200062
6. 国家信息研究所, 东京　101-8430, 日本
7. 纽约大学物理系, 纽约　10003, 美国

收稿日期:2021-02-19 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-03-28
通讯作者: BYRNESTim E-mail:tim.byrnes@nyu.edu
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(62071301, 11850410426); 上海市科学技术委员会科研基金 (19XD1423000); 中国科学技术交流中心基金(NGA-16-001)

Optically mediated entanglement between Bose-Einstein condensates

Shuai GAO¹, Matthew PREST^1,², Ebubechukwu O. ILO-OKEKE^2,³, Manikandan KONDAPPAN⁴, Juan E. ARISTIZABAL-ZULUAGA^1,², Valentin IVANNIKOV^1,^5,^6,⁷, Tim BYRNES^1,^5,^6,^7,*()

1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China
2. Department of Physics, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai　200122, China
3. Department of Physics, School of Science, Federal University of Technology, Imo State　460001, Nigeria
4. Department of Precision Science and Natural Sciences, Institute of Physics, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Medellín　05001000, Colombia
5. NYU-ECNU Institute of Physics at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai　200062, China
6. National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo　101-8430, Japan
7. Department of Physics, New York University, New York, NY　10003, USA

Received:2021-02-19 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-28
Contact: Tim BYRNES E-mail:tim.byrnes@nyu.edu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

着重研究了一种在玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态 (Bose-Einstein Condensate, BEC) 之间产生光学介导纠缠的方案. 该方案使用量子非破坏性哈密顿量, 并将BEC置于马赫-曾德(Mach-Zehnder)构型中. 结果表明, 通过对光进行测量, 可以诱导产生纠缠态. 还特别分析了纠缠态在退相干作用下的效应. 研究表明, 该纠缠态的行为表现对于原子与光的作用时间较为敏感: 当相互作用时间 $ \tau \lesssim \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} $ 时, 该纠缠态相对稳定; 当相互作用时间 $\tau > \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}$ 时, 该纠缠态则相对脆弱.

关键词: 玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态, 量子非破坏性测量, 双自旋纠缠态, 退相干

Abstract:

This paper explores a method for generating optically mediated entanglement between Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). Using a quantum nondemolition Hamiltonian with BECs placed in a Mach-Zehnder configuration, it is shown that entangled states can be induced by performing measurement on light. In particular, the effects of the entangled state in the presence of decoherence were analyzed. The behavior of the entangled state was found to be sensitive to the atom-light interaction time. The entangled state is relatively stable when the dimensionless interaction time $ \tau \lesssim \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} $ and relatively fragile when the time is greater.

Key words: Bose-Einstein condensate, quantum nondemolition measurement, two-spin entangled state, decoherence

中图分类号:

O431.2

高帅, PRESTMatthew, ILO-OKEKEEbubechukwu O., KONDAPPANManikandan, ARISTIZABAL-ZULUAGAJuan E., IVANNIKOVValentin, BYRNESTim. 玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态间的光学介导纠缠[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 2022(2): 93-105.

Shuai GAO, Matthew PREST, Ebubechukwu O. ILO-OKEKE, Manikandan KONDAPPAN, Juan E. ARISTIZABAL-ZULUAGA, Valentin IVANNIKOV, Tim BYRNES. Optically mediated entanglement between Bose-Einstein condensates[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(2): 93-105.

图/表 5

参考文献 39

1	NIELSEN M A, CHUANG I L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information [M]. 10th Anniversary ed. [S.l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
2	HORODECKI R, HORODECKI P, HORODECKI M, et al. Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2009, 81 (2): 865. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
3	BENNETT C H, BRASSARD G, CRÉPEAU C, et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters, 1993, 70 (13): 1895- 1899. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895
4	EKERT A K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Physical Review Letters, 1991, 67 (6): 661. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
5	BYRNES T, ROSSEAU D, KHOSLA M, et al. Macroscopic quantum information processing using spin coherent states. Optics Communications, 2015, 337, 102- 109. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.08.017
6	BYRNES T, WEN K, YAMAMOTO Y. Macroscopic quantum computation using Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A, 2012, 85 (4): 4233- 4237.
7	GROVER L K. Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Physical Review Letters, 1997, 79 (2): 325. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325
8	FADEL M, ZIBOLD T, DÉCAMPS B, et al. Spatial entanglement patterns and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in Bose-Einstein condensates. Science, 2018, 360 (6387): 409- 413. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1850
9	KUNKEL P, PRÜFER M, STROBEL H, et al. Spatially distributed multipartite entanglement enables EPR steering of atomic clouds. Science, 2018, 360 (6387): 413- 416. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2254
10	LANGE K, PEISE J, LÜCKE B, et al. Entanglement between two spatially separated atomic modes. Science, 2018, 360 (6387): 416- 418. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2035
11	BYRNES T, ILO-OKEKE E O. Quantum Atom Optics: Theory and Applications to Quantum Technology [M]. [S.l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
12	GROSS C. Spin squeezing, entanglement and quantum metrology with Bose-Einstein condensates [J]. Journal of Physics B, 2012, 45(10): 103001.
13	SØRENSEN A, DUAN L M, CIRAC J I, et al. Many-particle entanglement with Bose–Einstein condensates. Nature, 2001, 409 (6816): 63- 66. doi: 10.1038/35051038
14	MACHIDA S, YAMAMOTO Y, ITAYA Y. Observation of amplitude squeezing in a constant-current–driven semiconductor laser. Physical Review Letters, 1987, 58 (10): 1000- 1003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1000
15	WU L A, KIMBLE H J, HALL J L, et al. Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion. Physical Review Letters, 1986, 57 (20): 2520- 2523. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2520
16	SLUSHER R E, HOLLBERG L W, YURKE B, et al. Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity. Physical Review Letters, 1985, 55 (22): 2409- 2412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2409
17	BREITENBACH G, SCHILLER S, MLYNEK J. Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light. Nature, 1997, 387 (6632): 471- 475. doi: 10.1038/387471a0
18	MACOMBER J D, LYNCH R. Squeezed spin states. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1985, 83 (12): 6514- 6519. doi: 10.1063/1.449838
19	WALLS D F, ZOLLER P. Reduced quantum fluctuations in resonance fluorescence. Physical Review Letters, 1981, 47 (10): 709- 711. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.709
20	WODKIEWICZ K, EBERLY J H. Coherent states, squeezed fluctuations, and the SU(2) am SU(1,1) groups in quantum-optics applications. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 1985, 2 (3): 458- 466. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.2.000458
21	KITAGAWA M, UEDA M. Squeezed spin states. Physical Review A, 1993, 47 (6): 5138- 5143. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138
22	MUESSEL W, STROBEL H, LINNEMANN D, et al. Scalable spin squeezing for quantum-enhanced magnetometry with Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 113 (10): 103004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.103004
23	HALD J, SØRENSEN J L, SCHORI C, et al. Spin squeezed atoms: A macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 83 (7): 1319- 1322. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1319
24	NAVARRETE-BENLLOCH C . Quantum information with continuous variables [M]// An Introduction to the Formalism of Quantum Information with Continuous Variables. [S.l]:[s.n.], 2015.
25	MOXLEY F, DOWLING J, DAI W, et al. Sagnac interferometry with coherent vortex superposition states in exciton-polariton condensates. Physical Review A, 2016, 93, 053603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.053603
26	HILLERY M. Quantum cryptography with squeezed states. Physical Review A, 2000, 61 (2): 022309. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.022309
27	BONDURANT R S, SHAPIRO J H. Squeezed states in phase-sensing interferometers. Physical Review D Particles & Fields, 1984, 30 (12): 2548- 2556.
28	BREUER H P, PETRUCCIONE F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems [M]. [S.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2002.
29	REICHEL J, VULETIC V. Atom Chips [M]. [S.l.]: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
30	WHITLOCK S, GERRITSMA R, FERNHOLZ T, et al. Two-dimensional array of microtraps with atomic shift register on a chip. New Journal of Physics, 2009, 11 (2): 023021. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023021
31	ABDELRAHMAN A, MUKAI T, HÄFFNER H, et al. Coherent all-optical control of ultracold atoms arrays in permanent magnetic traps. Optics Express, 2014, 22 (3): 3501- 3513. doi: 10.1364/OE.22.003501
32	BÖHI P, RIEDEL M F, HOFFROGGE J, et al. Coherent manipulation of Bose–Einstein condensates with state-dependent microwave potentials on an atom chip. Nature Physics, 2009, 5 (8): 592- 597. doi: 10.1038/nphys1329
33	RIEDEL M F, BÖHI P, LI Y, et al. Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology. Nature, 2010, 464 (7292): 1170- 1173. doi: 10.1038/nature08988
34	ILO-OKEKE E O, BYRNES T. Information and backaction due to phase-contrast-imaging measurements of cold atomic gases: Beyond Gaussian states. Physical Review A, 2016, 94 (1): 013617. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.013617
35	LONE M Q, BYRNES T. Suppression of the ac-Stark-shift scattering rate due to non-Markovian behavior. Physical Review A, 2015, 92 (1): 011401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.011401
36	VIDAL G, WERNER R F. Computable measure of entanglement. Physical Review A, 2002, 65 (3): 032314. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314
37	PLENIO M B. Logarithmic negativity: A full entanglement monotone that is not convex. Physical Review Letters, 2005, 95 (9): 090503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.090503
38	BYRNES T. Fractality and macroscopic entanglement in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A, 2013, 88 (2): 023609. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.023609
39	LIDAR D A, WHALEY K B. Decoherence-free subspaces and subsystems [M]// Irreversible Quantum Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 622. Berlin: Springer, Berlin, 2003: 83-120.

玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态间的光学介导纠缠

Optically mediated entanglement between Bose-Einstein condensates

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 39

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价