甲醛与戊二醛固定剂对基于Ludox–QPS染色方法的研究结果对比

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2022.03.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为检验甲醛与戊二醛固定并经Ludox–QPS (Ludox Density Gradient Centrifugation Combined with Quantitative Protargol Staining, 硅胶提取结合定量蛋白银染色)染色后的微型底栖动物群落研究结果是否具有可比性, 本研究于2019年4月对采自长江口湿地3种自然生境 (海三棱藨草滩、光滩和沙滩) 的底栖纤毛虫群落, 分别用终浓度1%的甲醛与2%的戊二醛进行固定后, 通过ANOSIM (Analysis of Similarities, 相似性分析) 双因子 (固定剂类型与生境类型) 交叉分析方法, 检验两种固定剂固定的群落在物种组成、生物量和多样性上的差异. 研究结果表明: 虽然不同生境之间纤毛虫群落结构存在显著差异, 但固定剂类型对其群落的物种组成、多样性参数 (物种数、个体数、均匀度、香农–维纳指数) 以及生物量均无显著影响. NMDS (Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling, 非度量多维尺度) 分析结果 (stress = 0.11) 也显示, 两种固定剂固定的纤毛虫群落物种组成相似. 以上结果表明, 这两种固定剂获得的底栖纤毛虫群落, 在经过Ludox–QPS染色后的研究结果具有可比性. 因此, 甲醛溶液也可用于微型底栖生物样品的固定.

关键词: 多样性, 群落结构, 微型底栖动物, 纤毛虫, 固定剂

Abstract:

Density gradient centrifugation in combination with quantitative protargol stain (Ludox–QPS) is an important research method for the separation, extraction, and staining of microbenthos. Glutaraldehyde solution is the most widely used fixative for this method; however, it is a hazardous chemical and transportation by civil aviation is forbidden. Hence, biogeography studies using glutaraldehyde solution on a large scale are greatly limited. In contrast, samples fixed with formaldehyde solution can be transported by air consignment under certain conditions. To test whether the results of a study on microbenthic communities fixed with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde are comparable, we collected microbenthic samples from three natural habitats (bare mudflat, Scirpus mariqueter meadow, sandy beach) and fixed them with either formaldehyde (final concentration is 1%) or glutaraldehyde (final concentration is 2%). Then, we tested the significance of differences in species composition, diversity, and biomass of the communities using an ANOSIM two-way crossed analysis (fixative type and habitat type). The results of this study demonstrate that although significant differences exist in the community structures among the three habitats, the species composition, diversity indices (number of species, number of individuals, evenness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index), and biomass of the microbenthic communities between the two fixative types have no significant differences. NMDS analysis also shows similar results (stress = 0.11). In conclusion, the data indicates that the microbenthic communities fixed by the two fixatives are comparable. Therefore, formaldehyde is also suitable for ecological research of microbenthos as a fixative.

Key words: diversity, community structure, microbenthos, ciliates, fixative

中图分类号:

王苗勋, 许媛. 甲醛与戊二醛固定剂对基于Ludox–QPS染色方法的研究结果对比[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 2022(3): 82-89.

Miaoxun WANG, Yuan XU. Comparison of the fixation effect of formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde on the Ludox–QPS method[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(3): 82-89.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 38

1	CAREY P G. Marine interstitial ciliates: An illustrated key [M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1992: 1-351.
2	杜永芬. 潮间带纤毛虫原生动物和小型底栖动物生态学研究 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2008.
3	代仁海. 潮间带底栖纤毛虫分类学及生态学初步研究 [D]. 山东青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2009.
4	类彦立, 徐奎栋. 海洋微型底栖生物调查方法与操作规程. 海洋与湖沼, 2011, 42 (1): 157- 164. doi: 10.11693/hyhz201101024024
5	孟昭翠. 黄海夏季微型底栖生物群落结构与生态特点 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2011.
6	类彦立, 徐奎栋. 海洋微型底栖生物调查规范: HY/T140—2011 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
7	方晓琪, 仇建标, 余海滨, 等. 海洋浮游植物调查中常见的固定和保存方法及其影响. 海洋湖沼通报, 2019, (6): 106- 111.
8	BURKILL P H. Ciliates and other microplankton components of a nearshore food–webs: Standing stocks and production processes. Ann Inst Oceanogr Paris N S, 1982, 58, 335- 350.
9	STOECKER D K, GIFFORD D J, PUTT M. Preservation of marine planktonic ciliates: Losses and cell shrink age during fixation. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1994, 110 (2/3): 239- 299.
10	JEROME C A, MONTAGNES D J, TAYLOR F J. The effect of the quantitative protargol stain and Lugol’s and Bouin’s fixatives on cell size: A more accurate estimate of ciliate species biomass. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2010, 40 (3): 254- 259.
11	XU K, DU Y, LEI Y, et al. A practical method of Ludox density gradient centrifugation combined with protargol staining for extracting and estimating ciliates in marine sediments. European Journal of Protistology, 2010, 46 (4): 263- 270. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2010.04.005
12	中国民用航空局. 旅客和机组携带危险品的航空运输规范: MH/T1030–2018 [S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2018.
13	张武昌, 肖天, 王荣. 海洋微型浮游动物的丰度和生物量. 生态学报, 2001, 21 (11): 1893- 1908. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2001.11.021
14	TURLEY C M, HUGHES D J. Effects of storage on direct estimates of bacterial numbers of preserved seawater samples. Deep Sea Research, 1992, 39 (3/4): 375- 394.
15	CHOI J W, STOECKER D K. Effects of fixation on cell volume of marine planktonic protozoa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1989, 55 (7): 1761- 1765. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.7.1761-1765.1989
16	STOECKER D K. An experimentally determined carbon: Volume ratio for marine “Oligotrichous” ciliates from estuarine and coastal water. Limnology and Oceanography, 1989, 34 (6): 1097- 1103. doi: 10.4319/lo.1989.34.6.1097
17	OHMAN M D, SNYDER R A. Growth kinetics of the omnivorous oligotrich ciliate Strombidium sp. . Limnology and Oceanography, 1991, 36 (5): 922- 935. doi: 10.4319/lo.1991.36.5.0922
18	LEAKEY R J G, BURKLL P H, SLEIGH M A. A comparison of fixatives for the estimation of abundance and biovolume of marine planktonic ciliate populations. Journal of Plankton Research, 1994, (4): 375- 389.
19	曾钰婷. 少毛类纤毛虫定量方法比较——QPS与福尔马林固定液之数量体积及分类能力的评估 [D]. 台湾地区基隆市: 台湾海洋大学, 2012.
20	孟昭翠, 类彦立, 和莹莹, 等. 样品保藏方式与时间对海洋底栖细菌及原生生物荧光计数效能的影响. 海洋科学, 2010, 34 (5): 13- 20.
21	宋微波, 沃伦, 胡晓钟. 中国黄渤海的自由生纤毛虫 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
22	LYNN D H. The Ciliated Protozoa: Characterization, Classification, and Guide to the Literature [M]. 3th ed. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2008.
23	NOZAIS C, PERISSINOTTO R, TITA G. Seasonal dynamics of meiofauna in a South African temporarily open/closed estuary (Mdloti Estuary, Indian Ocean). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 2005, 62 (1/2): 325- 338.
24	HAMELS I, MUYLAERT K, SABBE K, et al. Contrasting dynamics of ciliate communities in sandy and silty sediments of an estuarine intertidal flat. European Journal of Protistology, 2005, 41 (4): 241- 250. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2005.02.002
25	周红, 张志南. 大型多元统计软件PRIMER的方法原理及其在底栖群落生态学中的应用. 青岛海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 3 (1): 58- 64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5174.2003.01.023
26	XU Y, FAN X, WARREN A, et al. Functional diversity of benthic ciliate communities in response to environmental gradients in a wetland of Yangtze Estuary, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 127, 726- 732. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.068
27	VERISSIMO H, BREMNER J, GARCIA C, et al. Assessment of the subtidal macrobenthic community functioning of a temperate estuary following environmental restoration. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 23, 312- 322. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.020
28	PAGANELLI D, MARCHINI A, OCCHIPINTI A. Functional structure of marine benthic assemblages using Biological Traits Analysis (BTA): A study along the Emilia–Romagna coastline (Italy, North–West Adriatic Sea). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 2012, 96, 245- 256. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.014
29	BREMNER J, ROGERS I S, FRID L C. Functional diversity of macrobenthic assemblages decreases in response to sewage discharges. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 66, 65- 75. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.003
30	WONG M C, DOWD M. Patterns in taxonomic and functional diversity of macrobenthic invertebrates across seagrass habitats: A case study in Atlantic Canada. Estuaries and Coasts, 2015, 38 (6): 2323- 2336. doi: 10.1007/s12237-015-9967-x
31	张遐, 鞠躬, 董光皎. 甲醛和戊二醛应用于神经系统免疫组织化学组织固定的特性分析. 神经解剖学杂志, 1990, 6 (2): 249- 256.
32	马族航. 上海崇明岛东滩湿地底栖纤毛虫的物种多样性及其生态学研究 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2018.
33	OTA T, TANIGUCHI A. Standing crop of planktonic ciliates in the East China Sea and their potential grazing impact and contribution to nutrient regeneration. Deep Sea Research, 2003, 50 (2): 423- 442. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00461-7
34	HWANG S J, HEATH R T. The distribution of Protozoa across a trophic gradient, factors controlling their abundance and importance in the plankton food web. Journal of Plankton Research, 1997, 19 (4): 491- 518. doi: 10.1093/plankt/19.4.491
35	XU Y, YAO S, SOETAERT K, et al. Effects of salt marsh restoration on eukaryotic microbenthic communities in Yangtze Estuary [J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2020, 638: 39–50.
36	TURLEY C M, HUGHES D J. Effects of storage on direct estimates of bacterial numbers of preserved seawater samples. Deep Sea Research, 1992, 39 (3): 375- 394.
37	刘华雪, 谭烨辉, 黄良民, 等. 夏季南海北部纤毛虫群落组成及其水平分布. 生态学报, 2010, 30 (9): 2340- 2346.
38	周百灵, 孟昭翠, 赵峰, 等. 长江口外海域微型和小型底栖生物群落结构和时空变化. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (15): 5050- 5063.

	物种组成	物种数	个体数	均匀度	香农-维纳多样性指数	生物量
固定剂类型	0.104	–0.014	–0.052	0.045	–0.019	–0.051
生境类型	0.235*	0.063	0.127*	0.160*	0.041	0.234**

[1]	蔡北溟，陈晓双，达良俊，王瑞. 上海市环城绿带建成初期林下自然草本植物多样性格局及其成因[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 20120, 2012(6): 13-20.
[2]	杨春懿, 马广翔, 顾俊杰, 顾佳艳, 何国富, 孔维鑫, 杨根森. 底泥疏浚生态环境效应的后评价研究——以山东省某河段整治为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 2022(3): 61-70.
[3]	徐娴雅, BOERIStefano, 胥一波. 垂直森林绿化系统中土壤微生物多样性研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 2022(3): 8-16.
[4]	邢诗晨, 戴尊, 陈星, 王健. 浙江省2种叶附生唇鳞苔属植物新记录[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 2022(1): 70-75.
[5]	冯超, 甘雨晨, 贺晓, 雷少刚, 程伟, 黄赳, 寇瑾. 草原矿区苔藓植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 2022(1): 76-84.
[6]	张明丽, 崔易翀, 达良俊. 杭州不同城市生境杂草群落分布格局及其成因[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(2): 120-131.
[7]	郑明铭, 李笑寒, 黄力, 杨圣贺, 胡四维, 杨永川. 重庆市郊不同弃耕年限旱地植物群落变化特征[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(2): 132-141.
[8]	罗祖奎, 李扬, 徐曦, 屈铭志, 马进, 孙文, 黄舒欣, 仝慧林. 江苏省沉海圩乡村湿地水稻田种植模式转变后的生态恢复效果[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 2020(4): 164-172.
[9]	吴雪, 黄力, 靳程, 钱深华, 杨永川. 重庆主城区杂草物种组成特征及多样性格局[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 2020(2): 98-109.
[10]	罗祖奎, 李扬, 刘文, 李性苑. 自然湿地与人工湿地水鸟多样性的昼夜差异[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 2019(3): 120-130.
[11]	罗祖奎; 李扬; 曹福平; . 贵州安龙十里荷塘4种生境冬季林鸟差异性[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 2017(1): 125-131.
[12]	乐莺. 上海市环城绿带乡土草本物种多样性及城市绿化应用潜力[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 2016(4): 169-176.
[13]	王萧慧, 吴娜, 范鑫鹏, 顾福康. 包囊游仆虫包囊形成和解脱过程中微管蛋白基因表达的变化[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 2014(6): 101-108.
[14]	王春叶，周斌，丁晓东，黄备. 围垦对椒江口夏季浮游植物群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 2014(4): 141-153，179.
[15]	潘李念, 万文彬, 张姝芳, 诸葛慧, 周品品, 杨仙玉. 中华大蟾蜍gal-3基因多样性的原因分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 2013(6): 171-180.