Computational Intelligence in Emergent Applications

Research on artificial intelligence assisted decision-making algorithms for lawyers based on legal-computing theory

  • CHEN Liang ,
  • GUO Jia-wen ,
  • WU Jian-gong ,
  • WANG Zhan-quan ,
  • SHI Ling
Expand
  • 1. Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2. School of Law, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
    3. China-UK Low Carbon College, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 201306, China;
    4. School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received date: 2019-07-28

  Online published: 2019-10-11

Abstract

At present, there is a lack of intelligent decision-making tools applied to legal theory and practice. Given the characteristics of data in this field, we establish an intelligent decision-making algorithm using a variety of data analysis models. Legal-computing is focused on data-based mechanization of legal reasoning. It establishes a relationship between legal research and applications using the characteristics and data features of computer science. On this basis, the method of "implication classification" is formed, the decision tree and Naive Bayes algorithms are improved for application to the legal arena, and a coordinate system of legal relationships is established to transfer traditional legal relationship analysis into a spatial geometric system. Experimental results show that the algorithm is consistent with a lawyer's handling strategy and results, and has the feasibility of assisting lawyers more broadly in decision-making.

Cite this article

CHEN Liang , GUO Jia-wen , WU Jian-gong , WANG Zhan-quan , SHI Ling . Research on artificial intelligence assisted decision-making algorithms for lawyers based on legal-computing theory[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2019 , 2019(5) : 85 -99 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2019.05.007

References

[1] LEE LOEVINGER. Jurimetrics:The next step forward[J]. Minnesota Law Review, 1949(5):455-493.
[2] 何勤华.计量法律学[J].法学, 1985(10):38.
[3] 屈茂辉,张杰,张彪.论计量方法在法学研究中的运用[J].浙江社会科学, 2009(3):21-27.
[4] 张妮,蒲亦非.计算法学导论[M].成都:四川大学出版社, 2015.
[5] ATKINSON K, BENCH-CAPON T, MCBURNEY P. Parmendies:Facilitating deliberation in democracies[J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2006(14):261-275.
[6] KONING J L, DUBOIS D. Suitable properties for any electronic voting system[J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2006(14):251-260.
[7] 李本.美国司法实践中的人工智能:问题与挑战[J].中国法律评论, 2018(2):54-56.
[8] 崔亚东.人工智能与司法现代化[M].上海:上海人民出版社, 2019.
[9] HOLMES O. The path of the law[J]. Havard Law Review, 1897(10):457.
[10] 宋晖,刘晓强.数据科学技术与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社, 2018.
[11] 陈为,朱标,张宏鑫. BN-Mapping:基于贝叶斯网络的地理空间数据可视分析[J].计算机学报, 2016(7):1281-1293.
[12] 韩伟,沈霄凤,王云.信息系统的属性重要性度量及知识约简算法比较[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004(3):131-134.
[13] 杨青,王海洋,卞梦阳,等.融合贝叶斯推理与随机游走的好友推荐[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018(4):80-89.
[14] 匡俊,唐卫红,陈雷慧,等.基于特征工程的视频点击率预测算法[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018(3):77-87.
[15] 崔佳旭,杨博.贝叶斯优化方法和应用综述[J].软件学报, 2018(10):3068-3090.
Outlines

/