Ecological and Environmental Sciences

Effects of combined application of water-retaining agents and organic fertilizer on soil water-holding capacity in waste dumps in open pit coal mines

  • Guilin WANG ,
  • Heyi GONG ,
  • Kankan SHANG ,
  • Liangjun DA
Expand
  • 1. CHN Energy Zhunneng Group Co. Ltd., Ordos, Inner Mongolia 010300, China
    2. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
    3. Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China
    4. Institute for Interdisciplinary and Innovate Research, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China

Received date: 2022-04-21

  Accepted date: 2022-10-20

  Online published: 2023-05-25

Abstract

This study investigated the combined application of water-retaining agents and organic fertilizers to enhance the soil water-holding capacity of waste dumps in open pit coal mines by measuring the anti-evaporation capacity and water content of man-made soil. The results showed that the anti-evaporation capacity of water-retaining agents in the gel state was superior to that in the dry state. Among the tested water-retaining agents, we found that France Essen at a concentration of 5% was the optimal choice. The soil water-holding time could be prolonged by the combined application of water-retaining agents and organic fertilizers, resulting in improved soil water-holding capacity. The optimum ratio of water-retaining agents to organic fertilizer was 3‰∶20% or 5‰∶10%. The water retention time of field capacity in this area would be improved by more than one time. Our findings provide valuable insights for the scientific community regarding soil remediation in waste dumps within open pit coal mines in Northwest China.

Cite this article

Guilin WANG , Heyi GONG , Kankan SHANG , Liangjun DA . Effects of combined application of water-retaining agents and organic fertilizer on soil water-holding capacity in waste dumps in open pit coal mines[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023 , 2023(3) : 64 -70 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2023.03.007

References

1 冯超, 甘雨晨, 贺晓, 等. 草原矿区苔藓植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, (1): 76- 84.
2 李海宽, 张雅楠. 内蒙古黑岱沟矿区排土场土壤质量评价. 中国水土保持, 2014, (10): 63- 66.
3 马佳慧, 张兴昌, 邱莉萍. 黑岱沟矿区排土场不同复垦方式下土壤性质的研究. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22 (1): 93- 96.
4 李鹏飞, 张兴昌, 朱首军, 等. 植被恢复对黑岱沟矿区排土场土壤性质的影响. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35 (5): 64- 70.
5 陈宝玉, 王洪君, 滕轶, 等. 保水剂对土壤温度和水分动态的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6 (6): 32- 36.
6 杨永辉, 吴普特, 武继承, 等. 保水剂对冬小麦不同生育阶段土壤水分及利用的影响. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26 (12): 19- 26.
7 李想, 张宝娟, 李继泉, 等. 保水剂与有机肥配施对铁尾矿理化性质的改良作用. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28 (2): 554- 562.
8 冯瑞云, 王慧杰, 郭峰, 等. 秸秆型土壤改良剂对土壤结构和水分特征的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34 (9): 44- 48.
9 李想, 张宝娟, 李继泉, 等. 保水剂与有机肥配合施加对铁尾矿基质下植物生长的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 37 (3): 44- 50.
10 蒋美佳, 刘晓林, 冯钰梅, 等. 有机肥配施保水剂对紫色土水分入渗及氮素淋溶的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33 (5): 99- 104.
11 王荣, 刘吉青, 周海霞, 等. 生物有机肥与保水剂对设施连作黄瓜生长和土壤肥力的影响. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47 (8): 45- 53.
12 陈显双, 韦丽君, 付海天, 等. 不同剂型保水剂对木薯植株性状及产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35 (S2): 76- 79.
13 荣俊冬, 凡莉莉, 陈礼光, 等. 不同用量保水剂对沿海沙地麻竹生理特征的影响. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50 (2): 323- 329.
14 肖红玉. 保水剂对土壤持水特性的影响研究. 广东水利水电, 2020, (5): 28- 32.
15 何宇, 吕卫光, 张娟琴, 等. γ-聚谷氨酸的研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48 (18): 18- 22.
16 张婧, 侯党社, 辛莹娟, 等. 天然高分子改性保水剂的研究进展. 陕西农业科学, 2020, 66 (10): 76- 80.
17 徐婉婷, 韩舒, 师庆东, 等. 不同保水剂在干旱环境下的基本性能对比研究. 节水灌溉, 2015, (8): 38- 41.
18 王志玉, 刘作新. 高吸水树脂的性能及其在农业上的应用. 土壤通报, 2004, 35 (3): 352- 356.
19 郭世文, 李品芳, 芦谅, 等. 不同土壤水分条件下施用黄腐酸与保水剂对玉米生长、耗水及水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22 (1): 1- 11.
20 盖霞普, 刘宏斌, 翟丽梅, 等. 长期增施有机肥/秸秆还田对土壤氮素淋失风险的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51 (12): 2336- 2347.
21 宋以玲, 于建, 陈士更, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对油菜生长及土壤微生物和酶活性影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32 (1): 352- 360.
22 张雅楠. 黑岱沟排土场复垦地植被类型及土壤理化性质的研究 [D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2013.
Outlines

/