Computer Science

Hierarchical description-aware personalized recommendation system

  • Daojia CHEN ,
  • Zhiyun CHEN
Expand
  • 1. School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. School of Data Science and Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 20062, China

Received date: 2022-05-04

  Online published: 2023-11-23

Abstract

Review text contains comprehensive user and item information and it has a great influence on users’ purchase decision. When users interact with different target items, they may show complex interests. Therefore, accurately extracting review semantic features and modeling the contextual interaction between items and users is critical for learning user preferences and item attributes. Focusing on enhancing the personalization capture and dynamic interest modeling abilities of recommender systems, and considering the usefulness of different features, we propose a hierarchical description-aware personalized recommendation (DAPR) algorithm. At the word level of review text, we design a personalized information selection network to extract important word semantic features. At the review level, we design a neural network based on a cross-attention mechanism to dynamically learn the usefulness of reviews, concatenate review summaries as descriptions, and devise a co-attention network to capture rich context-aware features. The analysis of five Amazon datasets reveal that the proposed method can achieve comparable recommendation performance to the baseline models.

Cite this article

Daojia CHEN , Zhiyun CHEN . Hierarchical description-aware personalized recommendation system[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023 , 2023(6) : 73 -84 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2023.06.007

References

1 MCAULEY J, LESKOVEC J. Hidden factors and hidden topics: Understanding rating dimensions with review text [C]// Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 2013: 165-172.
2 LING G, LYU M R, KING I. Ratings meet reviews, a combined approach to recommend [C]// Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 2014: 105-112.
3 ZHENG L, NOROOZI V, YU P S. Joint deep modeling of users and items using reviews for recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 2017: 425-434.
4 SEO S, HUANG J, YANG H, et al. Interpretable convolutional neural networks with dual local and global attention for review rating prediction [C]// Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 2017: 297-305.
5 CHEN C, ZHANG M, LIU Y Q, et al. Neural attentional rating regression with review-level explanations [C]// Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 2018: 1583-1592.
6 LIU D H, LI J, DU B, et al. DAML: Dual attention mutual learning between ratings and reviews for item recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2019: 344-352.
7 WU L B, QUAN C, LI C L, et al. A context-aware user-item representation learning for item recommendation[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2019, 37(2). DOI: 10.1145/3298988.
8 CHIN J Y, ZHAO K Q, JOTY S, et al. ANR: Aspect-based neural recommender [C]// Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2018: 147-156.
9 WU S W, ZHANG Y X, ZHANG W T, et al. Enhanced review-based rating prediction by exploiting aside information and user influence [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2021, 222: 107015.
10 TAY Y, LUU A T, HUI S C. Multi-pointer co-attention networks for recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2018: 2309-2318.
11 WU C H, WU F Z, LIU J X, et al. Hierarchical user and item representation with three-tier attention for recommendation [C]// Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2019: 1818-1826.
12 ZENG H S, AI Q Y. A hierarchical self-attentive convolution network for review modeling in recommendation systems [EB/OL]. (2020-11-26)[2022-03-21]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.13436.
13 KOREN Y, BELL R, VOLINSKY C.. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 2009, 42 (8): 30- 37.
14 TAN Y Z, ZHANG M, LIU Y Q, et al. Rating-boosted latent topics: Understanding users and items with ratings and reviews [C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-16). IJCAI, 2016: 2640-2646.
15 BAO Y, FANG H, ZHANG J.. TopicMF: Simultaneously exploiting ratings and reviews for recommendation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2014, 28 (1): 2- 8.
16 DIAO Q M, QIU M H, WU C Y, et al. Jointly modeling aspects, ratings and sentiments for movie recommendation (JMARS) [C]// Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2014: 193-202.
17 WANG H, WANG N Y, YEUNG D Y. Collaborative deep learning for recommender systems [C]// Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2015: 1235-1244.
18 KIM D, PARK C, OH J, et al. Convolutional matrix factorization for document context-aware recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 2016: 233-240.
19 CATHERINE R, COHEN W. TransNets: Learning to transform for recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 2017: 288-296.
20 WANG X, OUNIS I, MACDONALD C. Leveraging review properties for effective recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. ACM, 2021: 2209-2219.
21 DONG X, NI J C, CHENG W, et al. Asymmetrical hierarchical networks with attentive interactions for interpretable review-based recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20). AAAI, 2020: 7667-7674.
22 LI C L, QUAN C, PENG L, et al. A capsule network for recommendation and explaining what you like and dislike [C]// Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 2019: 275-284.
23 LIU H T, WANG W J, PENG Q Y, et al. Toward comprehensive user and item representations via three-tier attention network [J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2021, 39(3). DOI: 10.1145/3446341.
24 GAO J Y, LIN Y, WANG Y S, et al. Set-sequence-graph: A multi-view approach towards exploiting reviews for recommendation [C]// Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2020: 395-404.
25 CHEN Y. Convolutional neural network for sentence classification [D]. Waterloo, ON Canada: University of Waterloo, 2015.
26 VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need [C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. ACM, 2017: 6000–6010.
27 DAUPHIN Y N, FAN A, AULI M, et al. Language modeling with gated convolutional networks [C]// Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 70. ACM, 2017: 933-941.
28 OVED N, LEVY R. Pass: Perturb-and-select summarizer for product reviews [C]// Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2021: 351-365.
29 LU J S, YANG J W, BATRA D, et al. Hierarchical question-image co-attention for visual question answering [C]// Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. ACM, 2016: 289-297.
Outlines

/