Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science) >

2024 , Vol. 2024 >Issue 4: 137 - 149

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2024.04.013

Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System

Accounting and change analysis of ecological asset in Yingpu Street, Shanghai

  • Chen ZHANG ,
  • Zhi TANG ,
  • Yan LU ,
  • Rui LI ,
  • Zhongyang GUO
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China
    2. School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Spatial-temporal Big Data Analysis and Application of Natural Resources in Megacities, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shanghai　200241, China
    4. Technology Innovation Center for Land Spatial Eco-restoration in Metropolitan Area, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shanghai　200003, China
    5. Center for Shanghai Municipal Construction Land and Land Consolidation, Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources, Shanghai　200003, China

Received date: 2023-05-15

  Accepted date: 2023-09-15

  Online published: 2024-07-23

Fold

Abstract

This study investigated the ecological assets of Yingpu Street, Shanghai, using historical aerial imagery data. Using various methods, such as the ecological assets balance sheet and correlation analysis, changes in the ecological assets of Yingpu from 2000 to 2021, as well as the underlying mechanisms behind these changes, were analyzed. The results showed that, in 2021, the ecological assets of Yingpu Street mainly consisted of arable land, wetlands, and grasslands with an overall moderate quality. The total ESV(ecological service value) was 9.39 × 106 CNY (Chinese Yuan) and was mainly due to contributions from water conservation and waste treatment services. The ecological assets of Yingpu decreased significantly during the period from 2000 to 2021, with the stock and flow decreasing by 33.07 and 22.97%, respectively. Urban construction led to a reduction in farmland ecological assets and was the major contributor to the overall decline observed. Returning farmlands to forests and grasslands played a key role in the substantial increase of forest and grassland ecological assets. The ESV of Yingpu was negatively correlated with night light intensity, population, GDP (gross domestic product), land surface temperature, and DEM (digital elevation model) (p < 0.001), but was positively correlated with slope (p < 0.001).

Key words： ecological assets; stock; flow; correlation analysis; Yingpu Street

Cite this article

Chen ZHANG , Zhi TANG , Yan LU , Rui LI , Zhongyang GUO . Accounting and change analysis of ecological asset in Yingpu Street, Shanghai[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2024 , 2024(4) : 137 -149 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2024.04.013

References

1 COSTANZA R, GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al.. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26, 152- 158.
2 COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al.. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387, 253- 260.
3 CARDINALE B J, DUFFY J E, GONZALEZ A, et al.. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 2012, 486 (7401): 59- 67.
4 BORRELLI P, ROBINSON D A, FLEISCHER L R, et al.. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications, 2017, 8 (1): 2013.
5 FAN Y V, PERRY S, KLEME? J J, et al.. A review on air emissions assessment: Transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 194, 673- 684.
6 BAI Y, ZHUANG C W, OUYANG Z Y, et al.. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8 (2): 177- 183.
7 郇庆治.. 习近平生态文明思想的体系样态、核心概念和基本命题. 学术月刊, 2021, 53 (9): 5- 16.
8 郭韦杉, 李国平, 王文涛.. 自然资源资产核算: 概念辨析及核算框架设计. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31 (11): 11- 19.
9 HEIN L, BAGSTAD K, EDENS B, et al.. Defining ecosystem assets for natural capital accounting. Plos One, 2016, 11 (11): e0164460.
10 欧阳志云, 郑华, 谢高地, 等.. 生态资产、生态补偿及生态文明科技贡献核算理论与技术. 生态学报, 2016, 36 (22): 7136- 7139.
11 李璞, 王晓强, 徐卫华, 等.. 基于CiteSpace文献计量分析的生态资产研究现状及启示. 生态学报, 2023, 43 (21): 9082- 9095.
12 刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 赵文武, 等.. 生态资产核算与生态系统服务评估: 概念交汇与重点方向. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (23): 8267- 8276.
13 封志明, 杨艳昭, 李鹏.. 从自然资源核算到自然资源资产负债表编制. 中国科学院院刊, 2014, 29 (4): 449- 456.
14 姜立鹏, 覃志豪, 谢雯, 等.. 中国草地生态系统服务功能价值遥感估算研究. 自然资源学报, 2007, (2): 161- 170.
15 王敏, 江波, 白杨, 等.. 上海市生态资产核算体系研究. 环境污染与防治, 2018, 40 (4): 484- 490.
16 游旭, 何东进, 肖燚, 等.. 县域生态资产核算研究——以云南省屏边县为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (15): 5220- 5229.
17 欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等.. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33 (21): 6747- 6761.
18 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁.. 全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展. 资源科学, 2001, (6): 5- 9.
19 DAILY G C, TORE S, ANIYAR S, et al.. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 2000, 289 (5478): 395- 396.
20 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿.. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, (5): 19- 25.
21 ODUM H T, ODUM E P.. The energetic basis for valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 2000, (3): 21- 23.
22 袁周炎妍, 万荣荣.. 生态系统服务评估方法研究进展. 生态科学, 2019, 38 (5): 210- 219.
23 张舟, 吴次芳, 谭荣.. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用变化研究中的应用: 瓶颈和展望. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24 (2): 556- 562.
24 陈峰, 李红波, 张安录.. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价. 地理学报, 2019, 74 (3): 432- 445.
25 白杨, 李晖, 王晓媛, 等.. 云南省生态资产与生态系统生产总值核算体系研究. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32 (7): 1100- 1112.
26 吴泽昊, 赵爽, 罗征鹏, 等.. 遵义市土地利用变化及其生态系统服务价值. 安全与环境工程, 2023, 30 (1): 252- 260.
27 董天, 张路, 肖燚, 等.. 鄂尔多斯市生态资产和生态系统生产总值评估. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (9): 3062- 3074.
28 李龙, 吴大放, 王芳, 等.. 中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究——以佛山市为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (24): 9023- 9036.
29 李双成, 刘金龙, 张才玉, 等.. 生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式. 地理学报, 2011, 66 (12): 1618- 1630.
30 陈明辉, 陈颖彪, 郭冠华, 等.. 快速城市化地区生态资产遥感定量评估——以广东省东莞市为例. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27 (4): 601- 613.
31 梁晨, 曾坚, 沈中健, 等.. 快速城市化生态系统服务格局分析与空间管控——以厦门市为例. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (11): 4379- 4392.
32 王凯平, 冯悦, 邱陈澜, 等.. 环京津城市群生态系统服务的时空演变与驱动因素. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (19): 7871- 7883.
33 张丽云, 郭克疾, 李炳章, 等.. 唐古拉山以北地区生态资产核算. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (10): 3229- 3235.
34 张籍, 郭泺, 宋昌素, 等.. 青藏高原地区生态资产核算研究——以西藏自治区山南市为例. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (22): 9095- 9102.
35 方精云, 郭兆迪, 朴世龙, 等.. 1981 ~ 2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 2007, (6): 804- 812.
36 陈全. 喀斯特石漠化地区生态资产遥感评估及时空演变机制研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2021.
37 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等.. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 2008, (5): 911- 919.
38 谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖, 等.. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, (3): 10- 13.
39 HUANG B B, LI R N, DING Z W, et al.. A new remote-sensing-based indicator for integrating quantity and quality attributes to assess the dynamics of ecosystem assets. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 22, e00999.
40 史雪威, 陈绪慧, 蔡明勇, 等.. 宁夏全区及生态保护红线生态系统服务价值变化评估. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25 (5): 999- 1011.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉