洱海调蓄多塘湿地磷截留效果及影响因子研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2018.06.006

华东师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 2018 ›› Issue (6): 50-58,121.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2018.06.006

洱海调蓄多塘湿地磷截留效果及影响因子研究

李丹^1,2,3, 黄民生^1,2, 郑丙辉³, 储昭升³

1. 华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院, 上海 200241;
2. 华东师范大学崇明生态研究中心, 上海 200241;
3. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2018-03-14 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-12-01
通讯作者: 黄民生,男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为水环境治理与修复.E-mail:mshuang@des.ecnu.edu.cn. E-mail:mshuang@des.ecnu.edu.cn
作者简介:李丹,女,博士研究生,研究方向为水环境治理与修复.E-mail:lidan01@craes.org.cn.
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2014ZX07101012）

Performance and factors of phosphorus interception in storing multi-pond wetlands in the Erhai Lake Basin

LI Dan^1,2,3, HUANG Min-sheng^1,2, ZHENG Bing-hui³, CHU Zhao-sheng³

1. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;
2. Institute of Eco-Chongming, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;
3. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2018-03-14 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察洱海调蓄多塘湿地对磷的截留特征及效果，选取流域内12个调蓄多塘湿地进行定期跟踪调查，评估湿地中磷的截留性能，识别调蓄多塘湿地中磷的截留特征，解析调蓄多塘湿地中磷去除的主要影响因子.结果表明：调蓄多塘湿地的建立能够有效拦截面源污染携带的磷污染物，提升出水水质.湿地中η（PO₄^3--P）、η（TP）和η（SS）平均截留效率分别为43.44%~93.88%、27.71%~89.67%和21.84%~62.12%.枯水期进水磷浓度高于丰水期，且枯水期磷的截留效率优于丰水期，枯水期间歇性断流提供足够的停留时间，有助于污染物的去除.ρ_o（TP）与ρ_i（PO₄^3--P）（R=0.297）和ρ_i（TP）（R=0.304）显著正相关，η（TP）分别与调蓄多塘湿地进水ρ_i（PO₄^3--P）（R=0.665）和ρ_i（TP）（R=0.740）呈显著正相关.调蓄多塘湿地对磷的持留效率主要取决于进水中磷酸根所占比例及总磷的浓度.该研究以期为调蓄多塘湿地在磷入湖负荷削减、流域污染治理和水体修复等领域的应用提供可靠的案例支持.

关键词: 调蓄多塘湿地, 磷, 截留, 流域

Abstract: To investigate the characteristics and factors of phosphorus interception, phosphorus concentration from 12 storing multi-pond wetlands were analyzed. Evaluation of the removal efficiency and identification of the key factors of phosphorus removal were executed in the Erhai Lake Basin. The results showed that the water quality was effectively improved because phosphorus pollutants from the surface source pollution were intercepted in the storing multi-pond wetlands. The average interception efficiency value of η(PO₄^3--P), η(TP) and η(SS) were 43.44%~93.88%、27.71%~89.67% and 21.84%~62.12%, respectively. Both the phosphorus concentration of the influent and the efficiency of phosphorus interception in the dry season were higher, respectively, than those in the wet season. Intermittent outflow of effluent provided a residence time which was long enough for the removal of pollutants in the dry season. While ρ_o(TP) had a significantly positive correlation with ρ_i(PO₄^3--P) (R=0.297) and ρ_i(TP) (R=0.304). η(TP) showed a significant positive correlation with ρ_i(PO₄^3--P) (R=0.665) and ρ_i(TP) (R=0.740). The efficiency of phosphorus removal primarily depended on the proportion of phosphate and the TP concentration of the influent. This study may provide support as an engineering case of multi-pond wetlands for the reduction of phosphorus into lakes, water pollution control in basins, and water restoration.

Key words: storing multi-pond wetlands, phosphorus, interception, basin

中图分类号:

X524

李丹, 黄民生, 郑丙辉, 储昭升. 洱海调蓄多塘湿地磷截留效果及影响因子研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 2018(6): 50-58,121.

LI Dan, HUANG Min-sheng, ZHENG Bing-hui, CHU Zhao-sheng. Performance and factors of phosphorus interception in storing multi-pond wetlands in the Erhai Lake Basin[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2018, 2018(6): 50-58,121.

参考文献

[1] WU M, TANG X Q, LI Q Y, et al. Review of ecological engineering solutions for rural non-point source water pollution control in Hubei Province, China[J]. Water Air &Soil Pollution, 2013, 224(5):1-18.
[2] 翟玥, 尚晓, 沈剑, 等. SWAT模型在洱海流域面源污染评价中的应用[J]. 环境科学研究, 2012, 25(6):666-671.
[3] 李强. 洱海北部区域农村污水排放规律及控制技术研究[D]. 西安:长安大学. 2015
[4] 羊华, 李红燕, 李丽怀. 2015年洱海入湖河流磷负荷时空变化与洱海富营养化浅析[J]. 人民珠江, 2017, 38(7):77-79.
[5] 赵海超, 王圣瑞, 焦立新, 等. 2010年洱海全湖氮负荷时空分布特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(5):534-539.
[6] WANG S R, ZHENG B H, CHEN C, et al. Thematic issue:water of the Erhai and Dianchi Lakes[J]. Environmental Earth Science, 2015, 74(5):3685-3688.
[7] 佚名. 云南省开展调研洱海保护治理[J]. 给水排水, 2017(6):96-96.
[8] 金相灿, 胡小贞, 储昭升, 等. "绿色流域建设"的湖泊富营养化防治思路及其在洱海的应用[J]. 环境科学研究, 2011, 24(11):1203-1209.
[9] 张毅敏, 张永春, 左玉辉. 前置库技术在太湖流域面源污染控制中的应用探讨[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2003, 25(6):342-344.
[10] CHEN Q F, SHAN B Q, YI C Q, et al. An off-line filtering ditch-pond system for diffuse pollution control at Wuhan City Zoo[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 30(4):373-380.
[11] TANG W Z, ZHANG W Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Nitrogen removal from polluted river water in a novel ditch-wetland-pond system[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 60(11):135-139.
[12] HU S J, NIU Z G, CHEN Y F. Global wetland datasets:A review[J]. Wetlands, 2017(1):1-11.
[13] 毛战坡, 彭文启, 尹澄清, 等. 非点源污染物在多水塘系统中的流失特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2004, 1(3):530-535.
[14] 吴若静, 谢三桃. 多塘系统在巢湖山丘区面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2016(3):18-21
[15] 黄慧君, 王永平, 李庆红. 洱海流域近50年气候变化特征及其对洱海水资源的影响[J]. 气象, 2013, 39(4):436-442.
[16] 陈纬栋. 洱海流域农业面源污染负荷模型计算研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2011.
[17] DAVIS T W, BULLERJAHN G S, TUTTLE T, et al. Effects of increasing nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations on phytoplankton community growth and toxicity during planktothrix blooms in Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(12), 7197-7207.
[18] TU Y T, CHIANG P C, YANG J, et al. Application of a constructed wetland system for polluted stream remediation[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2014, 510(3):70-78.
[19] ZHANG D, GERBERG R M KEAT T S, et al. Constructed wetlands in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(10):1367-1378.
[20] KADLEC R H, WALALLCE S D. Treatment Wetlands[M]. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press, 2008.
[21] SCHOLES L, REVITT M, ELLIS J B, et al. A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88:467-478.
[22] LUO P, LIU F, LIU X, et al. Phosphorus removal from lagoon-pretreated swine wastewater by pilot-scale surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum aquaticum[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 576:490-497.
[23] ZHANG Y, CUI L J, LI W, et a1. Performance evaluation of an integrated constructed wetland used to treat a contaminated aquatic environment[J]. Wetlands Ecology & Management, 2014, 22(5):493-507.
[24] 彭剑峰, 王宝贞, 王琳. 塘-湿地组合处理系统中磷的主导去除机制分析[J]. 南京理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(5):609-612.
[25] BODIN H, PERSSON J, ENGLUND J E, et al. Influence of residence time analyses on estimates of wetland hydraulics and pollutant removal[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 501(10):1-12.
[26] DZAKPASU M, WANG X C, ZHENG Y C, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal by a surface-flow constructed wetland for polluted river water treatment[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2015, 71(6):904-12.
[27] 李伟, 崔丽娟, 张岩, 等. 水平潜流湿地磷去除效果及影响因子分析[J]. 湿地科学, 2014(4):464-470.
[28] SPIELES D J, MITSCH W J. The effects of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in con-structed wetlands:a comparison of low-and high-nutrient riverine systems[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1999, 14(1-2):77-91.
[29] MA L, HE F, HUANG T, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus transformations and balance in a pond-ditch circulation system for rural polluted water treatment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 94:117-126.
[30] MA L, HE F, SUN J, et al. Remediation effect of pond-ditch circulation on rural wastewater in southern China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 77:363-372.
[31] AL-RUBAEI, ENGSTROM M, VIKLANDER M, et al. Effectiveness of a 19-year old combined pond-wetland system in removing particulate and dissolved pollutants[J]. Wetlands, 2017, 37(3):485-496.
[32] WANG Z, WU J, MADDEN M, et al. China's wetlands:conservation plans and policy impacts[J]. Ambio, 2012, 41(7):782-786.

洱海调蓄多塘湿地磷截留效果及影响因子研究

Performance and factors of phosphorus interception in storing multi-pond wetlands in the Erhai Lake Basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘利华，郭雪艳，达良俊，李静文. 不同富营养化水平对挺水植物生长及氮磷吸收能力的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 20120, 2012(6): 39-45,72.
[2]	金芮合, 杨妤昀, 邬言, 杨静, 刘敏. 多功能区道路灰尘中有机磷酸酯分布累积特征[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 2024(6): 62-73.
[3]	李保, 金芮合, 张雨欣, 阮蔓菁, 邬言, 杨静, 刘敏. 长江口有机磷酸酯环境多介质传输分配行为[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 2024(6): 99-113.
[4]	张勇, 李灿, 张华林, 詹宇, 王慧, 肖逸凡, 杨丽丽, 刘佳奇, 蒯正龙. 太湖沿岸浅水湖泊生态修复过程中生态系统健康评价[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 2024(1): 17-28.
[5]	金智, 朱建荣, 仇威. 长江流域梯级水库夏末秋初蓄水对河口盐水入侵和淡水资源的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 2024(1): 90-103.
[6]	殷雪妍, 严广寒, 汪星. 太湖湖滨带水生植被恢复技术集成与应用浅析[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(4): 26-38.
[7]	国晓春, 韩镇阳, 卢少勇, 郑丙辉, 田泽斌. 太湖流域工业点源排污许可管理技术集成与应用研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(4): 39-45.
[8]	查阳, 王迪芳, 曹承进, 黄民生, 汪星, 俞博文, 刘畅, 都皓辰, 李梦茁. 太浦河金泽水源地大莲湖示范区水系水环境状况调查研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(4): 64-71.
[9]	刘畅, 俞博文, 曹承进, 黄民生, 汪星, 王迪芳, 查阳, 李梦茁, 都皓辰. 太浦河金泽水源地岸带结构及其环境资源状况调查研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(4): 72-80.
[10]	李文静, 王盛, 李庆, 武桃丽, 赵欣悦. 气候和土地利用变化对北三河流域生态系统水源供给服务功能的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 2021(4): 99-108.
[11]	章啸程, 蒋雪中. 源自青藏高原的大河流域近期入海物质通量变化及其影响分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 2020(3): 88-97.
[12]	陈杰, 王东启, 李杨杰, 俞琳, 陈振楼, 许世远. 我国主要潮间带沉积物中磷的含量、形态及释放[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 2019(4): 188-201.
[13]	许怡雯, 韩静, 何岩, 黄民生. 内源硫影响污染河湖磷营养盐环境行为的研究进展[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 2018(6): 74-80.
[14]	李文超, 王文浩, 何岩, 黄民生, 李志洪, 周焜, 朱林林. 黑臭河道沉积物中硫铁行为与氮磷循环的耦合机制[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 2015(2): 1-8.
[15]	段秀文, 蔡北溟, 陈晓双, 崔易翀, 达良俊. 城乡梯度上一年生杂草叶片氮磷含量的变化及其与土壤氮磷的关系[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 2015(2): 133-.