Analyzing the spatial equity of urban parks’〖KG*6〗social service functioning quantitatively: A case study for the central area of Shanghai

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.01.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Urban park is an important part of urban green infrastructure. From the perspective of human use, the primary function of urban parks is to provide leisure and entertainment opportunity and improve people's physical and mental health and other social services. To evaluate how well the function of social services is often related to the study of spatial equity. For analyzing the spatial equity of urban parks’ social service functioning indepth and inwidth, a new study frame optimization of accessibility models of assessing the spatial equity quantitatively is established. In this paper, the park service capability index and the spatial service equity index are set up and used in a case study of the central area of Shanghai at both the housing level and the district level. The results reveal that ① the two indexes in this study are effective to appraise the structure of urban parks and the equity of residents, and the quantitative method is feasible; ② the deviation coefficient of two indexes is more valuable than its absolute value for comparing the difference of equity between districts; ③ the method in this paper break through the limitations that traditional indicators just obtain mean level and can reflect the spatial difference on a small scale, providing clear guidance for planning and decisionmaking.

Key words: urban parks, social service function, spatial equity, quantitative analysis; GIS

HU Yue, CAI Yong-li. Analyzing the spatial equity of urban parks’〖KG*6〗social service functioning quantitatively: A case study for the central area of Shanghai[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.01.011.

References

[1] CHIESURA A.The role of urban parks for the sustainable city[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2004,68:129-138.
[2] NICHOLLS S. Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS[J].Managing Leisure,2001,6(4):201-219.
[3] KUNZMANN K R. Planning for spatial equity in Europe[J]. International Planning Studies,1998, 3(1):101-121.
[4] LANDRY S M, CHAKRABORTY J. Street trees and equity: Evaluating thespatial distribution of an urban amenity[J]. Environment and Planning A,2009,41(11):2651-2670.
[5] LUCY W. Equity and planningfor local services[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1981,47(4):447-457.
[6] MARSH M T,SCHILLING D A. Equity measurement in facility locationanalysis: A review and farmwork[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1994,74(1):1-17.
[7] 尹海伟，孔繁花，宗跃光. 城市绿地可达性与公平性评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3375-3383.
[8] 刘常富，李小马，韩东. 城市公园可达性研究：方法与关键问题[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(19):5381-5390.
[9] 江海燕，周春山，肖荣波. 广州公园绿地的空间差异及社会公平研究[J].城市规划,2010,34(4):43-48.
[10] 余柏蒗，胡志明，吴健平，等. 上海市中心城区公园绿地对居住区的社会服务功能定量分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(7):871-879.
[11] CHANG H S,LIAO C H. Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks[J]. Cities,2011,28(3):361-371.
[12] LUO W, QI Y. An enhancedtwostepfloatingcatchmentarea (E2SFCA) methodfor measuringspatialaccessibilitytoprimarycarephysicians[J]. Health & Place,2009,15:1100-1107.
[13] 鄢进军，秦华，鄢毅. 基于Huff模型的忠县城市公园绿地可达性分析[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,37(6):130-135.
[14] TALEN E, ANSELIN L. Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds[J]. Environment and Planning A,1998,30(4):593-613.
[15] MACINTYRE S, MACDONALD L, ELLAWAY A. Lack of agreement between measured and selfreported distance from public green parks in Glasgow, Scotland[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,2008,5(1):1-8.
[16] 尹海伟,孔繁花. 济南市城市绿地可达性分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2006(1):17-24.
[17] 袁丽华,徐培玮. 北京市中心城区公园绿地可达性分析[J]. 城市环境与城市生态,2015(1):22-30.
[18] 周廷刚，郭达志.基于GIS的城市绿地景观引力场研究：以宁波市为例[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):1157-1163.
[19] 胡志斌，何兴元，陆庆轩，等.基于GIS的绿地景观可达性研究：以沈阳市为例[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2005,21(6):671-675.
[20] 马林兵，曹小曙.基于GIS的城市公共绿地景观可达性评价方法[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2006,45(6):111-115.
[21] HUFF D L. Parameter Estimation in the Huff Model[EB/OL]. (2003-11-01)[2016-11-01].http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/1003/files/huff.pdf.
[22] 赵东霞,韩增林,王利,等. 基于两步移动搜寻法的城市居家养老服务设施可达性研究:以大连市沙河口区低龄老年人为例[J]. 地域研究与开发,2014(6):27-32.
[23] 中华人民共和国建设部.城市绿地分类标准：CJJ/T85—2002 [S]. 北京：中国标准出版社，2002.
[24] 上海市绿化市容管理局.上海市公园分类分级管理标准和考评办法[EB/OL]. (2015-06-02)[2016-11-01].http://www.docin.com/p-1187624429.html?qq-pf-to=pcqq.c2c.
[25] 古旭. 上海城市公园游客结构、行为与需求特征及其影响因素研究[D]. 上海：华东师范大学,2013:14-15.
[26] TALEN E .The social equity of urban service distribution: an exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado, and Macon, Georgia[J]. Urban Geography, 1997, 18: 521-541.
[27] TALEN E.Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners[J].Journal of the American planning Association, 1998, 64: 22-38.
[28] 上海统计市统计局.上海市第六次人口普查数据手册[EB/OL].(2012-02-02)[2015-12-01].http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/sjfb/201203/239823.html.
[29] 张庆费，夏檑，乔平，等. 上海公园的发展动态、分布格局与规模特征分析[J].中国园林,2001(1): 58-61.

Analyzing the spatial equity of urban parks’〖KG*6〗social service functioning quantitatively: A case study for the central area of Shanghai

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIU Na-na, GUO Xue-yan, CUI Yi-chong, ZHANG Hong, LU Jun-yao, DA Liang-jun. Research on service requirements and management strategies for urban parks with extended opening hours in Shanghai [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2019, 2019(3): 155-163.
[2]	YANG Gang, WANG Yong, XU Jie, DING You-zhong, YE Xin, WANG Zheng-huan. Influence of patch structure on bird community and structure in Shanghai large urban parks [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2016, 2016(6): 46-53.