Influence of habitat fragments on the richness of remnant natural forest species

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2022.03.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the classical theory of island biogeography, thirteen remnant forest patches of fragmented urban habitats were chosen as islands, and the Lao Mountain as the mainland. Then, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to analyze the relationship between species composition and four factors — namely, patch area, distance to species pool, human disturbance intensity, and isolation degree. The lengths of vectors in CCA biplots were used as weights for each influencing factor to calculate the overall sum, named the isolated island index (III); an isolated island index evaluation system of forest patches in fragmented urban habitats was subsequently designed. The results indicated that the relationship between III and richness was significantly negative for native species, but not significant for alien species richness. There was a significant relationship found for bird dispersal and wind dispersal species. The linear function was determined to be the best simulating model.

Key words: remnant natural forests, habitat fragment, species richness

CLC Number:

Q948

Hong LIANG, Liangjun DA, Kun SONG, Chunling ZHOU, Zhiwen GAO, Kai WANG. Influence of habitat fragments on the richness of remnant natural forest species[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(3): 17-26.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 45

1	陈小勇. 生境片断化对植物种群遗传结构的影响及植物遗传多样性保护. 生态学报, 2000, 20 (5): 884- 892.
2	FAETH S H, BANG C, SAARI S. Urban biodiversity: Patterns and mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2011, 1223 (1): 69- 81.
3	LIU D X, MA J H, SUN Y L, et al. Spatial distribution of soil magnetic susceptibility and correlation with heavy metal pollution in Kaifeng City, China. Catena, 2016, 139, 53- 60.
4	ZHANG D, ZHENG H F, HE X Y, et al. Effects of forest type and urbanization on species composition and diversity of urban forest in Changchun, Northeast China. Urban Ecosystems, 2016, 19, 455- 437.
5	宋永昌, 由文辉, 王祥荣. 城市生态学 [M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2000.
6	TIAN Z H, SONG K, DA L J. Distribution patterns and traits of weed communities along an urban–rural gradient under rapid urbanization in Shanghai, China. Weed Biology and Management, 2015, 15 (1): 27- 41.
7	MACARTHUR R H, WILSON E O. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 1963, 17, 373- 397.
8	赵淑清, 雷光春. 物种保护的理论基础——从岛屿生物地理学理论到集合种群理论. 生态学报, 2001, 21 (7): 1171- 1179.
9	HANSKI I, OVASKAINEN O. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. Theoretical Populmion Biology, 2003, 64 (1): 119- 127.
10	高增祥, 陈尚, 李典谟, 等. 岛屿生物地理学与集合种群理论的本质与渊源. 生态学报, 2007, 27 (1): 304- 313.
11	WILCOVE D S, MCLELLAN C H, DOBSON A P. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. Conservation Biology, 1986, (6): 237- 256.
12	MURPHY H T, LOVETT-DOUST J. Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: Does the matrix matter? [J]. Oikos. 2004, 105 (1): 3-14.
13	FORMAN R T T. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscape and Regions [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
14	LINDBORG R, ERIKSSON O. Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology, 2004, 85 (7): 1840- 1845.
15	YANG J, LUO X, LU S, et al. Effects of compositional and configurational heterogeneity of the urban matrix on the species richness of woody plants in urban remnant forest patches [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37: 619-632.
16	GODEFROID S, KOEDAM N. How important are large vs. small forest remnants for the conservation of the woodland flora in an urban context?. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2003, 12 (4): 287- 298.
17	GIBB H, HOCHULI D F. Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: Large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological Conservation, 2002, 106 (1): 91- 100.
18	HANNA E, CARDILLO M. Island mammal extinctions are determined by interactive effects of life history, island biogeography and mesopredator suppression. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23 (4): 395- 404.
19	DAN M, KOPEL D, WITTENBERG L. From rural-urban gradients to patch–matrix frameworks: Plant diversity patterns in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 169, 260- 268.
20	HONNAY O, ENDELS P, VEREECKEN H, et al. The role of patch area and habitat diversity in explaining native plant species richness in disturbed suburban forest patches in northern Belgium. Diversity and Distributions, 1999, 5 (4): 129- 141.
21	刘敏. 青岛历史文化名城价值评价与文化生态保护更新 [D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2003.
22	周光裕. 山东植物地理. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1955, (1): 78- 92.
23	王春叶, 李德志, 袁月, 等. 千岛湖区破碎化生境景观的归一化植被指数特征分析. 东北林业大学学报, 2012, 40 (5): 98- 101.
24	RIDD M K. Exploring V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious Surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: Comparative anatomy for cities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995, 16, 2165- 2185.
25	张胜强. 植物多样性对城市化梯度的响应 [D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2012.
26	任金华, 吴绍华, 周生路, 等. 城市不透水面遥感研究进展. 国土资源遥感, 2012, 24 (4): 8- 15.
27	KALMAR A, CURRIE D J. A global model of island biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2006, l5 (1): 72- 81.
28	GILLIAM F S, ROBERTS M R. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
29	刘灿然, 马克平, 于顺利, 等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性研究——种-面积曲线的拟合与评价. 植物生态学报, 1999, (6): 490- 500.
30	唐志尧, 乔秀娟, 方精云. 生物群落的种—面积关系. 生物多样性, 2009, 17 (6): 549- 559.
31	WILLIAMSON M. Island Population [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
32	HATTORI T, ISHIDA H. Relationship between species diversity, species composition and forest area of fragmented lucidophyllous forests in central Miyazaki prefecture. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 2000, 50 (3): 221- 234.
33	KENTARO M, HISAYUKI M, YUKIHIRO M. Factors influencing species diversity of ferns and fern allies in fragmented forest patches in the Kyoto city area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 70, 221- 229.
34	ANGOLD P G, SADLER J P, HILL M O, et al. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 360, 196- 204.
35	陈倬. 青岛植物的景观 [J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 1958(1): 257-272.
36	毛齐正, 马克明, 邬建国, 等. 城市生物多样性分布格局研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33 (4): 1051- 1064.
37	VAKHLAMOVA T V, HANS-PETER R, VICTOR K, et al. Recreational use of urban and suburban forests affects plant diversity in a Western Siberian City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 17, 92- 103.
38	ALIIHSAN S, ELAHEH Z. Simulation of future land surface temperature distribution and evaluating surface urban heat island based on impervious surface area. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122, 107230.
39	梁红. 城市化背景下青岛城市森林植被多样性格局成因及其维持 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2014.
40	王希明, 迟仁平. 青岛地区受威胁的鸟类及其保护. 山东林业科技, 2001, (6): 15- 18.
41	DA L J, OHSAWA M. Abandoned pine-plantation succession and the influence of pine mass-dieback in the urban landscape of Chiba, Central Japan. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 1992, 42 (1): 81- 93.
42	杨永川, 王娟, 达良俊. 城市化进程中上海植被的多样性、空间格局和动态响应(Ⅱ): 城市废弃地上海江湾机场的植物组成. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, (4): 40- 48.
43	尚玉昌. 普通生态学 [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002.
44	周劲松, 严岳鸿, 邢福武. 香港蒲台群岛植物传播与形成初步探讨. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 45 (2): 183- 188.
45	刘凤元, 李华. 乡土植物资源在城市水土保持中的应用. 水土保持应用技术, 2008, 8 (5): 44- 45.

片断化森林名称	斑块面积(A)/hm²	与种源距离(L)/km	人为干扰强度(H)	斑块隔离度(I)/hm²
浮山	700.00	19.54	1	50.74
太平山	56.64	25.90	2	208.81
青岛山	17.26	26.86	2	228.27
信号山	6.11	27.90	3	228.27
伏龙山	2.38	27.55	3	228.27
北岭山	46.54	21.78	3	315.40
嘉定山	17.98	21.96	3	315.40
牛毛山	9.10	17.15	3	380.10
小鱼山	2.50	27.51	4	228.27
贮水山	18.23	26.62	3	368.63
观象山	6.30	28.00	4	291.98
观海山	0.56	28.33	4	291.98
坛顶山	4.30	22.01	4	367.48

干扰等级	定义
1 无人为干扰
2 弱度人为干扰	单一干扰方式
3 中度人为干扰	双重干扰方式
4 强度人为干扰	多重干扰方式

影响因子	符号	具体解释
斑块面积	A	各丘陵面积, 由遥感图片测量得出
与种源距离	L	与崂山距离, 由遥感图片测量得出
人为干扰强度	H	1 为无人为干扰, 2 为弱度人为干扰, 3 为中度人为干扰, 4 为强度人为干扰
斑块隔离度	I	片断化森林斑块所处 2 km × 2 km网格内不透水面积

森林名称	归一化值				岛屿化综合指数
森林名称	A	L	H	I	岛屿化综合指数
浮山	1.000	0.690	0.250	0.133	0.921
太平山	0.081	0.914	0.500	0.549	1.412
青岛山	0.025	0.948	0.500	0.601	1.449
信号山	0.009	0.985	0.750	0.601	1.523
伏龙山	0.003	0.972	0.750	0.601	1.523
北岭山	0.066	0.769	0.750	0.830	1.529
嘉定山	0.026	0.775	0.750	0.830	1.543
牛毛山	0.013	0.605	0.750	1.000	1.562
小鱼山	0.004	0.971	1.000	0.601	1.585
贮水山	0.026	0.940	0.750	0.970	1.610
观象山	0.009	0.988	1.000	0.768	1.632
观海山	0.001	1.000	1.000	0.768	1.637
坛顶山	0.006	0.777	1.000	0.967	1.649
影响因子权重值	0.300	0.178	0.252	0.270

物种生活型	物种丰富度-岛屿化综合指数
物种生活型	最适函数	拟合函数	R²
总体	对数函数	y = 59.6 – 76.2lnx	0.619
乔木	线性函数	y = 1.828 – 0.023x	0.692
灌木	线性函数	y = 1.789 – 0.026x	0.780
藤本	线性函数	y = 1.722 – 0.085x	0.761
常绿	线性函数	y = 1.665 – 0.077x	0.420
落叶	线性函数	y = 1.818 – 0.012x	0.781
针叶	线性函数	y = 1.554 – 0.633x	0.861
阔叶	线性函数	y = 1.827 – 0.012x	0.794