Bryophyte diversity of a grassland mining area and its relationship with soil physical and chemical properties

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2022.01.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In this study, the Shengli Coal Mine—a representative coal mine in the semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia—and the adjacent Beizi Temple, Botanical Garden, and Nanshan Reservoir were selected as the study areas. By studying the correlation between the characteristics of the bryophyte community and the physical and chemical properties of the soil, the influence of soil on the distribution of bryophytes was analyzed during the reclamation process. The results showed that there were 4 families, 6 genera, and 7 species of bryophytes in the Shengli mining area. The total coverage of bryophytes in each habitat could be ranked according to the following order: Beizi Temple > Botanical Garden > south dump of the mining area > Nanshan Reservoir > plantation in the mining area > north dump of the mining area. An analysis of the diversity index, moreover, showed that the Shannon-Wiener index at the south dump was the highest, indicating that the species complexity of the moss community at the south dump was relatively high. An analysis of the correlation between the coverage of the bryophyte community and the physical and chemical properties of the soil showed that the soil pH value, silt content, sand content, and gravel content all had significant effects on the distribution of bryophytes. Multivariate analysis of the bryophyte community structure and soil physical and chemical properties showed that the differences in bryophyte community structure between different study areas was related to the cumulative influence of environmental factors.

Key words: semi-arid area, coal mining area, bryophytes, diversity, soil physical and chemical nature

CLC Number:

Q948

Chao FENG, Yuchen GAN, Xiao HE, Shaogang LEI, Wei CHENG, Jiu HUANG, Jin KOU. Bryophyte diversity of a grassland mining area and its relationship with soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(1): 76-84.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.3

References 42

1	赵红泽, 甄选, 厉美杰. 中国露天煤矿发展现状. 中国矿业, 2016, 25 (6): 12- 15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2016.06.003
2	全占军, 李远, 李俊生, 等. 采煤矿区的生态脆弱性——以内蒙古锡林郭勒草原胜利煤田为例. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24 (6): 1729- 1738.
3	白中科, 段永红, 杨红云, 等. 采煤沉陷对土壤侵蚀与土地利用的影响预测. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22 (6): 67- 70. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2006.06.013
4	康萨如拉, 哈斯敖其尔. 内蒙古草原区矿产开发对草地的影响. 经济研究导刊, 2011, 19, 31- 32.
5	李政海, 鲍雅静. 锡林郭勒草原荒漠化状况及原因分析. 生态环境, 2008, 17 (6): 2312- 2318. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2008.06.039
6	朱丽, 秦富仓. 露天煤矿开采项目水土流失量预测——以内蒙古锡林郭勒盟胜利矿区一号露天煤矿为例. 水土保持通报, 2008, (4): 111- 115.
7	陈鑫健. 内蒙古草原矿区土壤养分和重金属污染研究 [D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016.
8	陈肖鹏, 张朝晖. 贵州老万场金矿喀斯特石漠化区苔藓植物研究. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 28 (4): 144- 148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5570.2010.04.031
9	张朝晖, 潘莎. 贵州松桃水银厂苔藓植物群落生态特征. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 28 (4): 92- 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5570.2010.04.021
10	李冰. 贵州烂泥沟金矿区苔藓——蕨类植物区系及其生态恢复潜力研究 [D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2009.
11	韩旭. 煤矿区植被修复中生物土壤结皮基本特性研究 [D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2015.
12	GARCIA P F, BELNAP J, NEUER S, et al. Estimates of global cyanobacterial biomass and its distribution. Algological Studies, 2003, 109, 213- 227. doi: 10.1127/1864-1318/2003/0109-0213
13	邹蕴. 锡林浩特市露天矿区草地生态系统健康评价 [D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019.
14	王党朝, 刘慧芳, 肖武, 等. 胜利一号露天煤矿北排土场土壤物理性质空间分布研究. 中国煤炭, 2018, 44 (11): 135- 140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-530X.2018.11.026
15	牛振荣, 刘庆文. 应用土壤改良剂对提高林木成活率的作用—以锡林浩特生态植物园为例. 内蒙古林业, 2015, (2): 24.
16	LI X J, CROSBY M R, HE S. Moss Flora of China, English Edition, Vol. 2 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
17	白学良. 内蒙古苔藓植物志 [M]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学出版社, 1997.
18	高谦. 中国苔藓志. 第2卷 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.
19	贾渝, 何思. 中国生物物种名录(第一卷植物: 苔藓植物)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
20	窦金熙, 郭玉明, 王盛, 等. 土壤含水率测定方法研究. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45 (3): 482- 485. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2017.03.39
21	刘艳, 郑越月, 敖艳艳. 不同生长基质的苔藓植物优势种生态位与种间联结. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (1): 286- 293.
22	HOOPER D U, ADAIR E C, CARDINALE B J, et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 2012, 486, 105- 108. doi: 10.1038/nature11118
23	姜炎彬, 邵小明. 苔藓植物分布及其物种多样性的研究评述. 武汉植物学研究, 2010, 28 (3): 385- 390.
24	苏郎嘎, 田桂泉, 红霞. 浑善达克沙地苔藓物种多样性. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40 (3): 51- 59.
25	寇瑾, 白学良, 福英. 近五十年内蒙古大学校园内苔藓植物物种组成变化. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 43 (3): 283- 290.
26	贾昭, 简春霞, 熊沛枫, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕草地群落盖度与地上生物量关系. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27 (1): 319- 327.
27	邹蕴, 贺晓, 赵金花, 等. 我国北方草原区露天煤炭开采对周边草原群落的影响——以锡林浩特市西二矿为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33 (8): 199- 203.
28	郭玥微, 赵允格. 保存光强对耐干藓生理特性与营养繁殖的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47 (5): 116- 123.
29	王显蓉, 赵允格, 王媛. 干旱半干旱地区藓结皮人工培养研究进展. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29 (6): 66- 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2014.06.13
30	刘春雷. 干旱区草原露天煤矿排土场土壤重构技术研究 [D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2011.
31	ROSENTRETER R. Biocrust lichen and moss species most suitable for restoration projects. Restoration Ecology, 2020, 28 (S2): S67- S74.
32	BELNAP J. The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 20 (15): 3159- 3178.
33	孙鹏旸. 生物土壤结皮对草原露天矿排土场生态恢复的影响 [D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2017.
34	TÖRN A, RAUTIO J, NOROKORPI Y, et al. Revegetation after short-term trampling at subalpine heath vegetation. Annales Botanici Fennici, 2006, 43, 129- 138.
35	赵洋, 张鹏, 胡宜刚, 等. 黑岱沟露天煤矿排土场不同植被配置对生物土壤结皮拓殖和发育的影响. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33 (2): 269- 275.
36	吴鹏程. 苔藓植物生物学 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
37	孙儒泳. 基础生态学 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002.
38	余夏君, 刘雪飞, 洪柳, 等. 不同干扰程度下苔藓植物物种组成差异性研究——以恩施市区为例. 湖北林业科技, 2018, 47 (4): 63- 66.
39	YANG T T, CAO J, WANG Y C, et al. Soil moisture influences vegetation distribution patterns in sand dunes of the Horqin Sandy Land, Northeast China. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 105, 95- 101. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.035
40	李新凯, 卜崇峰, 李宜坪, 等. 放牧干扰背景下藓结皮对毛乌素沙地土壤水分与风蚀的影响. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25 (6): 22- 28.
41	JØRGENSEN S E. Ecosystem Ecology [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV, 2009: 3–479.
42	HE X L, HE K S, HYVÖNEN J. Will bryophytes survive in a warming world?. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2016, 19, 49- 60.

科名	属名	种名
牛毛藓科 Ditrichaceae	角齿藓属 Ceratodon	角齿藓 Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid.
真藓科 Bryaceae	真藓属 Bryum	真藓 Bryum argenteum Hedw.
真藓科 Bryaceae		垂蒴真藓 Bryum uliginosum (Brid) Bruch & Schimp
葫芦藓科 Funariaceae	葫芦藓属 Funaria	葫芦藓 Funaria hygrometrica Hedw.
丛藓科 Pottiaceae	对齿藓属 Didymodon	土生对齿藓 Didymodon vinealis (Brid.) Zand.
	盐土藓属 Pterygoneueum	盐土藓 Pterygoneurum subsessile (Brid.) Jur.
	扭口藓属 Barbula	扭口藓 Barbula unguiculata Hedw.

干扰强度	样地	苔藓总盖度/%	重要值
干扰强度	样地	苔藓总盖度/%	真藓	垂蒴真藓	土生对齿藓	角齿藓	盐土藓	葫芦藓	扭口藓
重度干扰	矿区南排	27.65	0.232	0.108	0.113	0.294	0.153	0.092	0.008
重度干扰	矿区北排	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
中度干扰	人工林	17.70	0.480	0.124	0	0.121	0.111	0.165	0
轻度干扰	植物园	62.00	0	0	1.000	0	0	0	0
	贝子庙	65.00	0	0	1.000	0	0	0	0
	水库	20.00	0	0	1.000	0	0	0	0

环境因子	pH	SWC	OP/(mg·kg^–1)	石砾/%	沙粒/%	粉粒/%	黏粒/%
矿区南排	7.584 ± 0.081b	0.032 ± 0.009a	0.013 ± 0.001c	1.294 ± 1.253a	76.374 ± 2.970b	22.217 ± 3.818b	0.017 ± 0.009b
矿区北排	7.703 ± 0.044a	0.023 ± 0.014b	0.013 ± 0.001c	1.905 ± 0.508a	81.158 ± 3.182a	16.674 ± 3.047c	0.013 ± 0.005b
人工林	7.674 ± 0.067ab	0.017 ± 0.002b	0.022 ± 0.002a	0.813 ± 0.785a	68.657 ± 2.013c	30.490 ± 2.742a	0.037 ± 0.006a
其余地区	7.644 ± 0.104ab	0.016 ± 0.007b	0.015 ± 0.002b	0.587 ± 0.849a	74.733 ± 7.410b	24.653 ± 8.223ab	0.017 ± 0.007b

	pH	OP	SWC	黏粒	粉粒	沙粒	石砾	苔藓盖度
pH	1
OP	0.109	1
SWC	–0.209	–0.283	1
黏粒	–0.097	0.550**	–0.201	1
粉粒	–0.252	0.543**	–0.212	0.574^**	1
沙粒	0.225	–0.577**	0.224	–0.596^**	–0.975^**	1
石砾	0.229	–0.204	0.164	–0.264	–0.686^**	0.531^**	1
苔藓盖度	–0.335*	0.021	0.092	0.265	0.440^**	–0.379^*	–0.455^**	1

[1]	CAI Bei-ming, CHEN Xiao-shuang, DA Liang-jun, WANG Rui. Study on the diversity pattern of natural herb under the forest of Shanghai Green Belt during its early building-up period [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 20120, 2012(6): 13-20.
[2]	Hongshuo ZOU, Min FU, Mengdie XIAO, Shiwen SHENG, Ping XU, Xuechu CHEN. Study on ecological purification system of tidal-flow paddy wetland based on multifunctional coupling [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2024, 2024(1): 58-67.
[3]	Xiyu LU, Wei LIU, Siyang WENG, Keqiang LI, Rong ZHANG. Generating diverse database isolation level test cases with fuzzy testing [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(5): 51-64.
[4]	Kun HE, Ziyu ZHANG, Annan SONG, Qifan SHEN, Jiayi WANG, Xuechu CHEN. Impact of coastal ecological restoration project on bird diversity and community dynamics [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(3): 158-166.
[5]	Yan GAO, Rong WANG. Diversity pattern and driving factors for soil microbes in a peri-urban area [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(3): 20-32.
[6]	Wei CHANG, Yongchuan YANG, Cheng JIN, Xinyang WANG, Li HUANG, Lihua ZHOU, Siwei HU. Diversity of plants in Chinese Taoist temples and the distribution pattern of Taoist tree species [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(3): 9-19.
[7]	Chunyi YANG, Guangxiang MA, Junjie GU, Jiayan GU, Guofu HE, Weixin KONG, Gensen YANG. Study on ecological environmental effects of sediment dredging: A case study on river regulation in Shandong Province [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(3): 61-70.
[8]	Xianya XU, Stefano BOERI, Yibo XU. Diversity of soil microbes in a vertical forest [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(3): 8-16.
[9]	Miaoxun WANG, Yuan XU. Comparison of the fixation effect of formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde on the Ludox–QPS method [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(3): 82-89.
[10]	Shichen XING, Zun DAI, Xing CHEN, Jian WANG. Two new records of epiphyllous Cheilolejeunea species recorded in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(1): 70-75.
[11]	Mingli ZHANG, Yichong CUI, Liangjun DA. Distribution and causes of ruderal communities in different urban habitats of Hangzhou [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2021, 2021(2): 120-131.
[12]	Mingming ZHENG, Xiaohan LI, Li HUANG, Shenghe YANG, Siwei HU, Yongchuan YANG. Variation characteristics of plant communities at abandoned farmlands of different ages in the Chongqing suburban area [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2021, 2021(2): 132-141.
[13]	LUO Zukui, LI Yang, XU Xi, QU Mingzhi, MA Jin, SUN Wen, HUANG Shuxin, TONG Huilin. Ecological restoration effect of paddy fields after rice planting pattern transformation in the rural wetlands of Chenhaiwei, Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2020, 2020(4): 164-172.
[14]	WU Xue, HUANG Li, JIN Cheng, QIAN Shenhua, YANG Yongchuan. Species composition and distribution pattern of weed communities in Chongqing metropolis [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2020, 2020(2): 98-109.
[15]	LIU Yan, Winira ILGHAR, Gulnigar AYSIRAHUN, Mamtimin SULAYMAN. Additional information on Sphagnaceae species in Xinjiang [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2018, 2018(3): 190-195,211.