Impact of ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet experimental data on CT18NNLO parton distribution functions

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2024.04.003

Abstract

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the impact of the inclusive jet double differential cross-section data retrieved from the ATLAS at the large hadron collider(LHC), at the center-of-mass energy of $ \sqrt{s}=2.76 $ TeV, on CT18NNLO parton distribution functions(PDFs) by applying the error PDF updating method package(ePump). First, the inclusive jet double differential cross-sections were calculated with non-perturbative correction using the CT18NNLO PDFs. It was observed that the theoretical predictions concurred with the experimental data. Thereafter, the correlation $ \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\phi $ was established between theoretical predictions for the inclusive jet double differential cross-sections and the CT18NNLO gluon PDFs. Finally, the ePump was applied to update the CT18NNLO PDFs; the differences between these data and the original global fitting data were investigated. The CT18NNLO gluon PDFs and ePump updated gluon PDFs were compared at $ Q=100 $ GeV, and it was found that the ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet double differential cross-sections data could slightly constrain the CT18NNLO gluon PDFs at both small and large $ x $ regions.

Key words: parton distribution function(PDF), inclusive jet, double differential cross-section

CLC Number:

O572.2

Ying XU, Honghao FAN, Sayipjamal DULAT. Impact of ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet experimental data on CT18NNLO parton distribution functions[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2024, 2024(4): 30-39.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

References 24

1	GAO J, GUZZI M, HUSTON J, et al.. CT10 next-to-next-to-leading order global analysis of QCD. Physical Review D, 2014, 89 (3): 3009- 3037.
2	DULAT S, HOU T J, GAO J, et al.. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics. Physical Review D, 2016, 93 (3): 3006- 3045.
3	HOU T J, GAO J, HOOBS T J, et al.. New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC. Physical Review D, 2021, 103 (1): 4013- 4102.
4	MARTIN A D, STIRLING W J, THORNE R S, et al.. Parton distributions for the LHC. The European Physical Journal C, 2009, 63 (2): 189- 285.
5	GIELE W T, KELLER S.. Implications of hadron collider observables on parton distribution function uncertainties. Physical Review D, 1998, 58 (9): 094023.
6	PUMPLIN J, STUMP D, BROCK R, et al.. Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions. II. The Hessian method. Physical Review D, 2001, 65 (1): 014013.
7	SCHMIDT C, PUMPLIN J, YUAN C P.. Updating and optimizing error parton distribution function sets in the Hessian approach. Physical Review D, 2018, 98 (9): 4005- 4028.
8	HOU T J, YU Z, DULAT S, et al.. Updating and optimizing error parton distribution function sets in the Hessian approach. II. Physical Review D, 2019, 100 (11): 4024- 4050.
9	ABLAT A, DULAT S, RASHIDIN R, et al.. The impact of single top data on CT14nnlo PDFs. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2020, 59 (10): 3023- 3031.
10	JANDAOLET Q, ABLAT A, OBUL P, et al.. ResBos and ePump analysis on ATLAS 8 TeV Z Boson transverse momentum distributions. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2021, 60 (8): 3013- 3023.
11	KHACHATRYAN V, SIRUNYAN A M, TUMASYAN A, et al.. Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=2.76\;\text{TeV} $. The European Physical Journal C, 2016, 76 (5): 265.
12	ATLAS Collaboration.. Measurement of the inclusive jet cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=2.76\;\text{TeV} $ and comparison to the inclusive jet cross-section at $ \sqrt{{s}}=7\;\text{TeV} $ using the ATLAS detector. The European Physical Journal C, 2013, 73 (8): 2509.
13	CHATRCHYAN S, KHACHATRYAN V, SIRUNYAN A M, et al.. Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=7\;\text{TeV} $. Physical Review Letters, 2011, 107 (13): 132001.
14	ATLAS Collaboration.. Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector. The European Physical Journal C, 2011, 71 (2): 1512.
15	CMS Collaboration.. Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton–proton collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=13\;\text{TeV} $. The European Physical Journal C, 2016, 76 (8): 451.
16	ATLAS Collaboration.. Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=13\;\text{TeV} $ with the ATLAS detector. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018, 2018 (5): 195.
17	CMS Collaboration.. Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}}=8\;\text{TeV} $ and cross section ratios to 2.76 and 7 TeV. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, 2017 (3): 156.
18	CATANI S, DOKSHITZER Y L, SEYMOUR M H, et al. Longitudinally-invariant k_⊥-clustering algorithms for hadron-hadron collisions [J]. Nuclear Physics B, 1993, 406(1/2): 187–224.
19	DOKSHITZER Y L, LEDER G D, MORETTI S, et al.. Better jet clustering algorithms. Journal of High Energy Physics, 1997, 1997, (8): 001.
20	CACCIARI M, SALAM G P, SOYEZ G.. The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008, (4): 063.
21	NAGY Z.. Next-to-leading order calculation of three-jet observables in hadron-hadron collisions. Physical Review D, 2003, 68 (9): 094002.
22	CARLI T, CLEMENTS D, COOPER S A, et al.. A posteriori inclusion of parton density functions in NLO QCD final-state calculations at hadron colliders: The APPLGRID project. The European Physical Journal C, 2010, 66 (3/4): 503- 524.
23	NADOLSKY P M, LAI H L, CAO Q H, et al.. Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables. Physical Review D, 2008, 78 (1): 013004.
24	DULAT S, HOU T J, GAO J, et al.. Intrinsic charm parton distribution functions from CTEQ-TEA global analysis. Physical Review D, 2014, 89 (7): 073004.

${p}_{\rm{T} }/{\rm{G} }{\rm{e} }{\rm{V} }$	$\dfrac{ { { {\rm{d} }^2}\sigma } }{ { {\rm{d} }{p_{\rm{T}}}{\rm{d} }y} }\bigg/\left({\rm{pb} } \cdot {\rm{GeV} }^{-1}\right)$
${p}_{\rm{T} }/{\rm{G} }{\rm{e} }{\rm{V} }$	$ \;\;0 < \left\| y \right\| < 0.3$	$ \;\;0.3\le \left\|{y}\right\| < 0.8 $	$ \;\;0.8\le \left\|{y}\right\| < 1.2 $	$\;\; 1.2\le \left\|{y}\right\| < 2.1 $	$ \;\;2.1\le \left\|{y}\right\| < 2.8 $
[20, 30)	1.5384600×10³	1.4377704×10³	1.3798916×10³	1.1331925×10³	7.7329912×10²
[30, 45)	2.2150128×10²	2.1154679×10²	1.9738048×10²	1.5469616×10²	9.5632160×10
[45, 60)	3.6918489×10	3.5139399×10	3.2166894×10	2.4144088×10	1.2999824×10
[60, 80)	8.2326240×10⁰	7.7657465×10⁰	6.9798336×10⁰	4.9971456×10⁰	2.1736095×10⁰
[80, 110)	1.5937779×10⁰	1.4892895×10⁰	1.3137586×10⁰	8.6743123×10^–1	2.6233632×10^–1
[110, 160)	2.2234142×10^–1	2.0566672×10^–1	1.7563194×10^–1	9.9943340×10^–2	1.4918304×10^–2
[160, 210)	2.8505367×10^–2	2.5983342×10^–2	2.0688327×10^–2	8.9323641×10^–3	3.1890336×10^–4
[210, 260)	5.5600776×10^–3	4.9568112×10^–3	3.6112230×10^–3	1.1091663×10^–3	5.0718720×10^–6
[260, 310)	1.3863267×10^–3	1.1994840×10^–3	7.7967450×10^–4	1.6426773×10^–4
[310, 400)	2.8738809×10^–4	2.3623479×10^–4	1.2890493×10^–4	1.6709517×10^–5
[400, 500)	3.7418436×10^–5	2.7636345×10^–5

${p}_{\rm{T} }/\mathrm{G}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$	$\dfrac{ {\mathrm{d} }^{2}\sigma }{\mathrm{d}{p}_{\rm{T}}\mathrm{d}y}\bigg/\left({\rm{pb} } \cdot {\rm{GeV} }^{-1}\right)$
${p}_{\rm{T} }/\mathrm{G}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$	$ \;\;0 < \left\|y\right\| < 0.3 $	$ \;\;0.3\le \left\|y\right\| < 0.8 $	$ \;\;0.8\le \left\|y\right\| < 1.2 $	$ \;\;1.2\le \left\|y\right\| < 2.1 $	$ \;\;2.1\le \left\|y\right\| < 2.8 $
[20, 30)	2.4598500×10³	2.3500976×10³	2.2529250×10³	1.8152484×10³	1.2019476×10³
[30, 45)	3.1228960×10²	3.0145236×10²	2.7660253×10²	2.1633248×10²	1.2973834×10²
[45, 60)	4.7902672×10	4.6029260×10	4.1514395×10	3.1097089×10	1.6409610×10
[60, 80)	1.0089798×10	9.6171296×10⁰	8.5636408×10⁰	6.0756592×10⁰	2.6591448×10⁰
[80, 110)	1.8820632×10⁰	1.7670888×10⁰	1.5513139×10⁰	1.0261035×10⁰	3.1419532×10^–1
[110, 160)	2.5800186×10^–1	2.3948886×10^–1	2.0121438×10^–1	1.1688440×10^–1	1.7786040×10^–2
[160, 210)	3.2501178×10^–2	2.9795730×10^–2	2.3448882×10^–2	1.0270738×10^–2	3.8745098×10^–4
[210, 260)	6.3145956×10^–3	5.6262384×10^–3	4.0857630×10^–3	1.2736568×10^–3	6.3790372×10^–6
[260, 310)	1.5750738×10^–3	1.3602210×10^–3	8.7494478×10^–4	1.8761759×10^–4
[310, 400)	3.2443446×10^–4	2.6577324×10^–4	1.4503890×10^–4	1.9276656×10^–5
[400, 500)	4.1876406×10^–5	3.1086030×10^–5

[1]	Zhiyi CUI, Jintao WU, Jianhong RUAN. Research on the muon excess in ultrahigh-energy cosmic ray of extensive air-showers [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2024, 2024(3): 27-35.
[2]	GAO Ying-ying, LOU Li-yang, RUAN Jian-hong. Research on the kaon parton distribution functions [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2017, 2017(2): 81-88.
[3]	XU Shi-Lei, RUAN Jian-Hong. Research on parton distributions in nucleon [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2015, 2015(1): 195-202.
[4]	YANG Dong-yan;RUAN Jian-hong. Twist-4 effect in polarized structure function(Chinese) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2009, 2009(1): 128-136.
[5]	HUANG Jian-hua;YANG Ji-feng. Investigation of the Renormalization of Nucleon Scattering(Chinese) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2005, 2005(2): 39-45.