中文核心期刊J* E* C* N* U* N* S* ›› 2026, Vol. 2026 ›› Issue (5): 51-65.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2026.05.005
• Data Systems and Platforms • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hu WANG1,2, Han ZHANG1, Tianhua WANG3, Chunyan ZHAO1,*(
)
Received:2026-07-17
Accepted:2026-08-05
Online:2026-09-25
Published:2026-09-12
Contact:
Chunyan ZHAO
E-mail:cyzhao@dase.ecnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Hu WANG, Han ZHANG, Tianhua WANG, Chunyan ZHAO. Design and scenario analysis of a trusted access mechanism for data resources[J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2026, 2026(5): 51-65.
Table 3
Key claims and verification constraints of the trusted access token"
| 声明域 | 关键声明 | 技术含义 | 资源侧验证约束 |
| 身份域 | sub_id、sub_type | 访问主体标识及主体类型, 可采用摘要化或脱敏标识 | 与请求中的数据主体、证照持有人或授权对象一致 |
| 调用域 | app_id、device_id、taa_id | 调用应用、可信终端和TAA实例标识 | 应在TAP登记, 证书状态有效, 且与准入场景匹配 |
| 授权域 | auth_id、auth_time、auth_method | 主体身份认证和主体主动授权事件 | 授权记录存在、未撤销, 授权时间和认证方式满足策略 |
| 资源域 | resource_id、scope、purpose | 可访问的数据资源、接口范围、 业务使用用途 | 请求接口、证照类型、 业务用途应包含在授权范围内 |
| 时效域 | iat、exp、jti、biz_no | 签发时间、失效时间、 令牌唯一标识和业务流水号 | 令牌未过期, 唯一标识或流水号未被重复使用 |
| 完整性保护域 | alg、kid、sig、enc | 签名算法、密钥标识、签名值和加密标识 | 验证签名、证书链、密钥状态和敏感字段保护方式 |
Table 4
Boundary conditions and handling boundaries"
| 边界条件 | 处置方案 | 外部依赖与残余风险 |
| TAP 密钥泄露 | 吊销密钥版本和相关令牌 | 密钥托管、轮换与泄露响应; 泄露窗口内令牌仍有风险 |
| TAA 或调用方被攻陷 | 证书撤销、范围用途校验、异常拒绝 | 授权交互真实性和端侧最小权限; 合法权限可能被滥用 |
| 终端/应用伪造 | 未登记、证书无效或绑定不一致拒绝 | 设备标识与证书生命周期; 完整性证明为可选扩展 |
| 绕过TAG直连资源 | 算法无法覆盖绕行请求 | 网络隔离、入口收敛和后端访问控制必须关闭直连 |
| 撤销同步延迟 | 短时效、在线状态查询、缓存过期 | 撤销传播仍存在时间窗口 |
| 系统时钟偏差 | 按策略容差校验iat/exp | 统一授时与监测; 偏差过大可能误拒或误放 |
| 审计日志篡改 | 关联摘要、签名或存证发现不一致 | 访问控制、备份和完整性保护; 不能证明业务事实本身 |
| 合法重试与重放冲突 | 原子状态区分首次、重试和冲突重放 | 幂等键、请求摘要与有限重试窗口 |
Table 5
Key interfaces, inputs, and outputs for trusted access"
| 接口类型 | 调用方向 | 主要输入 | 主要输出 |
| 终端与应用注册 | TAA/应用 -> TAP | 应用标识、终端指纹、 证书申请、场景编号 | 注册结果、证书或密钥材料、 准入策略 |
| 令牌申领 | TAA -> TAP | 可信访问凭证、授权事件、 资源范围、业务流水号 | 可信访问令牌、有效期、 令牌状态 |
| 令牌验证 | TAG -> TAP | 令牌标识或令牌摘要、 请求接口、请求上下文 | 验证结果、主体标识、 授权范围、处置建议 |
| 资源代理 | 调用方 -> TAG -> 资源服务 | API请求、可信访问令牌、 业务参数 | 资源响应、 拒绝原因或安全封装结果 |
| 审计写入 | TAA/TAP/TAG -> 审计模块 | 认证、授权、签发、 验证、访问事件摘要 | 全流程审计记录、 存证索引、追溯关联标识 |
Table 6
Component mapping for the electronic certificate scenario"
| 电子证照场景要素 | 本文模型对应项 | 主要职责或约束 |
| 持证主体 | 数据主体 | 完成身份认证、亮证或授权确认 |
| 社会化用证主体应用 | 调用应用 | 经场景准入后获得应用标识、密钥、账号和目录权限 |
| 可信设备或可信应用 | 可信终端 | 预先注册纳管, 持有设备证书或应用证书 |
| 可信访问代理 | TAA | 发起注册、签名、令牌申领和敏感字段保护 |
| 可信授权访问系统 | TAP | 管理证书、策略、令牌签发、令牌状态和审计记录 |
| 电子证照社会化应用系统 | TAG | 校验可信访问令牌, 执行资源侧强制鉴权 |
| 市电子证照库 | 受保护资源 | 在令牌验证通过后提供证照查询、照面、派生件等服务 |
| 防火墙、网闸、负载均衡 | 网络与部署组件 | 实现网络边界隔离、访问路径收敛、流量分发和高可用 |
| 数据库、消息队列和存储 | 平台基础设施 | 支撑业务、令牌状态、策略数据、审计数据和异步处理 |
Table 7
Invocation chain for trusted access to electronic certificates"
| 调用阶段 | 关键控制目标 | 验证或记录内容 |
| 场景与应用准入 | 确认用证处于许可范围 | 应用标识、终端状态、证书状态、证照目录权限 |
| 主体认证与授权 | 形成可验证的主体授权事件 | 主体标识摘要、授权方式、授权时间、业务流水号 |
| 令牌申领与签发 | 将授权事件转化为可验证凭据 | TAA签名、授权范围、业务用途、令牌有效期 |
| 证照服务请求 | 绑定请求参数与可信访问令牌 | 证照类型、访问接口、业务用途、业务流水号 |
| 资源侧验证 | 执行六元匹配和策略判定 | 签名、时效、撤销状态、资源范围、用途、防重放 |
| 资源访问与返回 | 通过后访问受保护证照资源 | 安全上下文、证照服务结果、返回状态 |
| 审计关联 | 关联认证、授权、签发、验证和访问事件 | 令牌标识、请求摘要、拒绝原因或访问结果 |
Table 8
Representative abnormal conditions and expected handling measures"
| 异常情形 | 触发条件 | 处置结果 |
| 未携带可信访问令牌 | 请求缺少可信访问令牌 | 拒绝访问 |
| 令牌伪造或篡改 | 签名、证书链或密钥状态校验失败 | 拒绝访问 |
| 令牌过期或撤销 | 超出有效期或令牌状态失效 | 拒绝访问 |
| 主体参数不一致 | 请求主体与令牌主体声明不匹配 | 拒绝访问 |
| 资源范围越权 | 请求证照类型或接口超出授权范围 | 拒绝访问 |
| 业务用途不一致 | 请求用途与令牌用途声明不一致 | 拒绝访问 |
| 重放或重复使用 | 非幂等请求命中已使用状态 | 拒绝访问或按幂等规则处理 |
| 应用或终端无效 | 应用、设备未登记或证书无效 | 拒绝访问 |
| 绕过TAG直连资源 | 请求未经过资源侧可信验证入口 | 阻断直连或拒绝资源服务访问 |
| 1 | 国务院. 关于构建数据基础制度更好发挥数据要素作用的意见 [Z]. 2022. |
| 2 | 国务院. 关于加快推进电子证照扩大应用领域和全国互通互认的意见 [Z]. 2022. |
| 3 | 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国数据安全法 [Z]. 2021. |
| 4 | 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法 [Z]. 2021. |
| 5 | 上海市人民政府办公厅. 上海市电子证照管理办法 [Z]. 2022. |
| 6 | Hardt D. RFC 6749: the OAuth 2.0 authorization framework [EB/OL]. (2012-10)[2026-06-25]. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749. |
| 7 | Sakimura N, Bradley J, Jones M, et al. OpenID Connect Core 1.0 [EB/OL]. (2014-11-08)[2026-06-25]. https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html. |
| 8 | Jones M, Bradley J, Sakimura N. JSON Web Token (JWT): RFC 7519 [EB/OL]. (2015-05)[2026-06-25]. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7519. |
| 9 | Rose S, Borchert O, Mitchell S, et al. Zero trust architecture: NIST SP 800-207 [R/OL]. (2020-08)[2026-06-25]. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207. |
| 10 | Ferraiolo D F, Kuhn D R. Role-based access controls [C]//15th National Computer Security Conference. 1992: 554-563. |
| 11 | Sandhu R S, Coyne E J, Feinstein H L, et al.. Role-based access control models. Computer, 1996, 29 (2): 38- 47. |
| 12 | Hu V C, Ferraiolo D F, Kuhn R, et al. Guide to attribute based access control (ABAC) definition and considerations: NIST SP 800-162 [R]. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014. |
| 13 | OASIS. eXtensible access control markup language (XACML) version 3.0 [EB/OL]. (2013-01-22)[2026-06-25]. https://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/3.0/xacml-3.0-core-spec-os-en.html. |
| 14 | Salehi S A, Han R C, Rudolph C, et al.. DACP: enforcing a dynamic access control policy in cross-domain environments. Computer Networks, 2023, 237, 110049. |
| 15 | Tsai M, Lee S, Shieh S W.. Strategy for implementing of zero trust architecture. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2024, 73 (1): 93- 100. |
| 16 | Denis N, Laurent M, Chabridon S.. A decentralized model for usage and information flow control in distributed systems. Computers & Security, 2024, 144, 103975. |
| 17 | U-ruekolan S, Rattananen M, Ponharn J, et al.. Enforcing data access control and privacy: the graph-driven data regulatory approach. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 2025, 93, 104163. |
| 18 | Jussen I, Möller F, Schweihoff J, et al.. Issues in inter-organizational data sharing: findings from practice and research challenges. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2024, 150, 102280. |
| 19 | GB/T 35273—2020 信息安全技术 个人信息安全规范 [S]. |
| 20 | GB/T 36901—2018 电子证照 总体技术架构 [S]. |
| 21 | GB/T 36906—2018 电子证照 共享服务接口规范 [S]. |
| 22 | 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国电子签名法 [Z]. 2019. |
| 23 | Zhang Q H, Yuan L Y, Xie T Y, et al.. Auditable and dynamic access control scheme with behavior and identity tracing. Computer Networks, 2024, 251, 110623. |
| 24 | Ou Z S, Xing X F, He S Q, et al.. TDS-NA: blockchain-based trusted data sharing scheme with PKI authentication. Computer Communications, 2024, 218, 240- 252. |
| 25 | Wang Q, Liu Y.. Blockchain empowered dynamic access control for secure data sharing in collaborative emergency management. Information Processing & Management, 2025, 62 (3): 103960. |
| [1] | Hanghang GENG, Xiaowei CHEN, Fanyu HAN, Wei WANG. Open-source collaboration governance for AI Agent capability ecosystems: A case study of OpenClaw [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2026, 2026(5): 167-177. |
| [2] | Weiru HAN, Wenyi HE, Yisheng JIN, Wei WANG, Moming DUAN. Open-source AI governance and discursive power in data standard-setting: Dilemmas, paths, and disciplinary perspectives [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2026, 2026(5): 145-152. |
| [3] | Pu ZHAO, Qingxi PENG, Yuang ZHANG, Xiejie JIN, Dezhou ZHAO. Open-source collaboration structure modeling and multilayer-network link-prediction methods [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(5): 109-124. |
| [4] | Rui WANG, Qiuyue LYU, Jia LIAO. Analysis of the status, hotspots, and trends of open-source innovation: A bibliometric study based on CNKI literature from 2005 to 2024 [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(5): 125-139. |
| [5] | Yunhu ZHAO, Yuzhou YANG, Lin QIN. Brief discussion on fair use for distribution of open-source large model datasets [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(5): 183-190. |
| [6] | Biaowei ZHUANG, Runtao LIU. Historical transformations and future prospects of open source ethics [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(5): 202-208. |
| [7] | Xudong REN, Zhipeng HUANG, Jiaheng PENG, Wei WANG. Liquidity design for ecological industries in the large language model era: Analysis of liquidity elements represented by open-source communities [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(5): 25-31. |
| [8] | Yuang ZHANG, Zhong XIE, Qinjun QIU, Liufeng TAO. Research and analysis of the development of the open source ecosystem in the field of geographic information system [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(5): 99-108. |
| [9] | Yuhang CHEN, Shizhou WANG, Zhengting TANG, Liangyu CHEN, Ningkang JIANG. Research on software classification based on the fusion of code and descriptive text [J]. J* E* C* N* U* N* S*, 2025, 2025(1): 46-58. |
| [10] | Chengyu ZHANG, Jiayi ZHU, Yihao HUANG, Di YANG, Jianwen LI, Weikai MIAO, Di YAN, Bin GU, Naijun ZHAN, Geguang PU. Machine-learning-based model checker performance prediction [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2024, 2024(4): 18-29. |
| [11] | Jie CHEN, Wenyi SHEN, Wenyu WU, Jiali MAO. Method for improving the quality of trajectory data for riding-map inference [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(6): 14-27. |
| [12] | Zhaoyang WU, Jiali MAO. Research on travel time prediction based on neural network [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2023, 2023(2): 106-118. |
| [13] | Yiming YU, Yuchen HONG, Ye WANG, Qiwen DONG. Design of experimental data governance module for chemical material formulation [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(5): 1-13. |
| [14] | Jiling LI, Baolin LI, Songru YAN. Research on user behavior portrait and subject mining in the express logistics field during Coronavirus epidemic [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(5): 100-114. |
| [15] | Xiao PAN, Dongna LU, Shuhai WANG. Capacitated route planning for supermarket distribution based on order splitting [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 2022(5): 147-164. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||