Analysis of microbial community composition from media used to strengthen total nitrogen removal from an urban river

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2018.06.012

Abstract

Abstract: We compared the removal rate of total nitrogen in urban rivers with three kinds of media (biochar, felt, and non-woven fabric). After 84 days in operation, it was found that non-woven fabric increased the removal rate of total nitrogen by 23.4% over the control group; felt increased the removal rate of total nitrogen by 13.9% over the control group; and biochar had a poor effect on total nitrogen removal. The microbial diversity and community composition of different media-enhanced groups were then systematically explored; the results showed that non-woven fabric can significantly increase microbial diversity and abundance. Moreover, proteobacteria, which is related to nitrogen conversion, was found to be significantly higher in the non-woven fabric group than the felt and biochar groups, especially the abundance of denitrifying bacteria (Azospirillum, Thiobacillus, and Azoarcus). The abundance of methanogen, which is in competition with the denitrifying bacteria Syntrophorhabdus, was found to be lower in non-woven fabric than in the control and biochar groups. The microbial flora structure of the felt group showed a similar trend to that of the non-woven fabric group, but the abundance of denitrifying bacteria was lower. The microbial community composition of the biochar group was the most similar to that of the control group. It is speculated that non-woven fabric has better biocompatibility than other groups; this is beneficial for biofilm formation and thereby promotes the growth of denitrifying bacteria. In a comprehensive comparison, non-woven media materials are more conducive to the removal of total nitrogen in urban rivers.

Key words: media, urban river, total nitrogen reduction, microbial action

CLC Number:

X522

HAN Jing, XU Yi-wen, HE Yan, HUANG Min-sheng. Analysis of microbial community composition from media used to strengthen total nitrogen removal from an urban river[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Sc, 2018, 2018(6): 97-104.

References

[1] 何岩, 沈叔云, 黄民生, 等. 城市黑臭河道底泥内源氮硝化-反硝化作用研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012(6):1166-1170.
[2] 于令芹. A/O短程硝化反硝化耦合污泥水解脱氮性能研究[D]. 辽宁大连:大连理工大学, 2009.
[3] 李志洪. 曝气扰动模式对黑臭河道底泥内源营养盐行为的影响作用及氮转化功能菌群响应规律研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2015.
[4] 李文超. 曝气扰动下城市黑臭河道底泥内源硫、铁行为与氮循环耦合作用研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2016.
[5] 付炳炳, 潘建新, 马景德, 等. 采用含硫铁化学污泥作为反硝化电子供体进行焦化废水中总氮深度去除[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 7:3262-3270.
[6] 黄子贤. 沉水植物对陆域水产养殖污染削减效应研究[D]. 上海:上海海洋大学, 2011.
[7] 王弘宇, 马放, 苏俊峰, 等. 好氧反硝化菌株的鉴定及其反硝化特性研究[J]. 环境科学, 2007, 28(7):1548-1552.
[8] 王润众, 郝瑞霞, 赵文莉. 新型缓释碳源的制备及其性能[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(1):81-87.
[9] ZHANG C, ZHU M Y, ZENG G M, et al. Active capping technology:A new environmental remediat-ion of contaminated sediment[J]. Enviromental Science and Pollution Resarch, 2016, 23(5):4370-4386.
[10] ZHOU Z M, HUANG T L, YUAN B L, et al. Remediation of nitrogen-contaminated sediment using bioreactive, thin-layer capping with biozeolite[J]. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 2016, 25(1):89-100.
[11] 国家环保局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1998:254-257.
[12] 黄华山, 杨志敏, 周真明, 等. 净水厂污泥覆盖控制底泥氮磷释放效果[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 37(3):347-351.
[13] 刘青松, 赵丽芳. 热解温度对生物炭表面性质及释放氮磷的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2016, 33(2):164-169.
[14] 姚丽平. 城市黑臭河道底泥微生物群落结构对人工曝气的响应特征及机理研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2014.
[15] 闫媛, 黎力, 王亚宜, 等. 采用高通量测序分析全程自养脱氮(CANON)系统不同脱氮效能下的微生物群落结构[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2015, 10:1485-1492.
[16] ZOU Y, LIN M X, XIONG W G, et al. Metagenomic insights into the effect of oxytetracycline on microbial structures, functions and functional genes in sediment denitrification[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 161:85-91.
[17] ZHANG K Y, GU J, WANG X J, et al. Variations in the denitrifying microbial community and functional genes during mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattlemanure[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634:501-508.
[18] WEI G, LI M, LI F, et al. Distinct distribution patterns of prokaryotes between se-diment and water in the Yellow River estuary[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2016, 100(22):9683-9697.
[19] 覃千山. 基于宏基因组的未培养互营烃降解菌‘Candidatus Smithella cisternae’的生物信息学研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2015.
[20] 孙寓姣, 左剑恶, 陈莉莉, 等. 同时产甲烷反硝化颗粒污泥中微生物群落结构[J]. 中国环境科学, 2007, 27(1):41-41.
[21] GAO F, LI Z W, CHANG Q B, et al. Effect of florfenicol on performance and microbial community of a sequencing batch biofilm reactor treating mariculture wastewater[J]. Environmental Technology, 2018, 39(3):363-372.
[22] 王薇, 蔡祖聪, 钟文辉, 等. 好氧反硝化菌的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(11):2618-2625.
[23] PAN J X, MA J D, WU H Z, et al. Simultaneous removal of thiocyanate and nitrogen from wastewater by autotrophic denitritation process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 267:30-37.
[24] 陈晶, 张敏特, 陈萍, 等. 菌剂强化潜流湿地总氮总磷去除及功能菌特性[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(12):2268-2274.
[25] 方晶晶, 马传明, 刘存富.反硝化细菌研究进展[J].环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(S1):206-210, 264.
[26] ZHANG R C, XU X J, CHEN C, et al. Interactions of functional bacteria and their cont-ributions to the performance in integrated autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification[J]. Water Research, 2018, 143:355-366.